Jump to content
The CHANI Project Conspiracy Forum
NewWorld

2016 US Presidential Election

Recommended Posts

@Arc, my eyes, my eyes

 

"Trump Must Be Stopped" Plead 'The Economist' And CFR As Financial Establishment Panics

February 28, 2016

Tyler Durden

 

 

"It's one thing for the republican establishment to throw up all over the candidacy of Donald Trump: frankly, the GOP has not been relevant as a political power ever since Boehner started folding like a lawn chair to Obama's every demand just around the time of the first US downgrade, and as such what the Republican party - torn apart and very much irrelevant as the best of the "establishment" GOP candidates demonstrate - thinks is largely irrelevant.

 

However, when such stalwart titans of financial establishmentarianism as the Council of Foreign Relations and "The Economist", who until now had been largely ignoring Trump's ascent in the political hierarchy finally unleash an all out assault and go after Trump on the very same day, you know that the flamboyant, hyperbolic billionaire has finally gotten on the nerves of some very high net worth individuals.

Below are excerpts from the panicked lamentations of the Economist as written down this weekend in "Time to fire Trump"

20160227_LDD002_0.jpg

snip

... just in case there was any confusion what The Economist thinks.

 

If the field remains split as it is now, it is possible for Mr Trump to win with just a plurality of votes. To prevent that, others must drop out. Although we are yet to be convinced by Mr Rubio, he stands a better chance of beating Mr Trump than anyone else. All the other candidates—including Mr Cruz, who wrongly sees himself as the likeliest challenger—should get out of his way. If they decline to do so, it could soon be too late to prevent the party of Abraham Lincoln from being led into a presidential election by Donald Trump.

And then there is the Council of Foreign Relations' Benn Steil with "Selling America Short" of which sections have been excerpted below:

 

snip

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-28/trump-must-be-stopped-plead-economist-and-cfr-financial-establishment-panics

 

Well I hope he has very very good security, as I remember Robert Kennedy quite well.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
came across this 

 

 

Planetary consciousness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
220px-The_Earth_seen_from_Apollo_17.jpg
 
The Earth Seen from Apollo 17

Planetary consciousness is the idea that human beings are members of a planetary society of Earth as much as they are members of their nations, provinces, districts, cities or villages.

 

 

History[edit]

In his 1906 book American Character, author Brander Matthews mentions the idea of a "league of nations" and a "planetary consciousness", believing it would be created by American politicians in the coming centuries.[1] Key planetary consciousness events of the 20th century include the creation of the League of Nations, the signing of Kellogg-Briand Pact, the creation of the United Nations, and the creation of the Bretton Woods systemDemocratic globalization advocate Abhay Kumar points to the International Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers(ICANN) board of directors election in 2000, which were conducted globally, as the first example of global democracy.[2] In September 2001, Ervin László and theDalai Lama wrote an essay titled "Manifesto on Planetary Consciousness", which was adopted at a meeting at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest.[3]Its introduction begins:

“ In the closing years of the twentieth century, we have reached a crucial juncture in our history. We are on the threshold of a new stage of social, spiritual, and cultural evolution, a stage that is as different from the stage of the earlier decades of this century as the grasslands were from the caves, and settled villages from life in nomadic tribes. We are evolving out of the nationally based industrial societies that were created at the dawn of the first industrial revolution, and heading toward an interconnected, information-based social, economic, and cultural system that straddles the globe.[3]

Andreas Bummel, CEO of the Committee for a Democratic UN, says, "The first step into the direction of a world parliament would be the establishment of a Parliamentary Assembly at the United Nations".[4]

Concept[edit]

Advocacy for the idea of planetary consciousness is based on the technological advancements made by the mankind in the fields of transport and telecommunications during the 20th century and in the first decade of the 21st century.[2] Kumar claims that these technological advancements have turned the whole planet into an interdependent economic, political and communication community.[2] He specifically cites the invention of the Internet and the mobile phones as key technological achievements of the 20th century which brought humans into more continuous interconnected communication.[2] He believes that these inventions will lead to a second Renaissance and global democracy, just as the Gutenberg press in 1439 led to the first Renaissance, the Age of Enlightenment, and Nation states.[2] Bummel describes planetary consciousness as integral, insofar as it does not conflict with other levels of social identity, but instead is a holistic perspective on humanity and the planet as a whole.[4] Steven Kull writes that while nation states are reluctant to work cooperatively, individuals seem more willing.[5]

Author Shashi Tharoor feels that an Earth Anthem sung by people across the world can inspire planetary consciousness and global citizenship among people.[6]

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GOP Leaders: Kasich 'Irrational' for Not Dropping Out

February 29, 2016

Sandy Fitzgerald

 

 

"Senior Republicans have been appealing to John Kasich to drop his bid for the presidential nomination, but the Ohio governor wants to stay in the race in hopes of winning his home state's primary on March 15 and then to gather party support should Florida Sen. Marco Rubio lose in his home state that same day, according to reports.

 
Republican lawmakers this past week have been calling Kasich's refusal to pull out, despite his low vote tallies, selfish, reports The New York Times. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says Kasich's insistence in staying in the race is irrational, because there is no way he can win the nomination, several senators said. 
 
"He’s just flailing his arms around and having a wonderful time going around the country, and it just drives me up the wall," an unnamed senior senator told The Times. 
 
Even former GOP nominee Mitt Romney has appealed to Kasich indirectly, saying the party needs to come together behind one strong rival. 
snip
 
 
In Irving, Ben Carson says he has been offered money, political support to drop out
February 27, 2016
Tristan Hallman
 
"IRVING — Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson told supporters Saturday that he has heard plenty of calls to drop out of the Republican presidential primary.

Some “special interests” have even made personal appeals to him, he said.
 
“I’ve got unanswered calls on my phone right now, ‘Oh, if you did this or did this, and did this, or if you drop out and support this guy, we’ll give you all this money and we’ll make sure you’re a senator here,’” Carson said. “What a bunch of crap. This is about saving our nation. This is not about horse-trading and making deals.”
 
Carson told a reporter afterward that he wasn’t going to say who called him, but said his reaction is those people can “go jump in a lake.”
 
The one-time Iowa frontrunner vowed to fight on days before the Texas primary, where polls show him in a battle with Ohio Gov. John Kasich for a distant fourth place in a field of five contenders. And in his speech at the Northeast Tarrant County Tea Party event, Carson continued to zig as his Republican rivals zag."
snip
 
 
 

 


 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooper Tuesday   !!!

 

CLINTON: AL, AR, GA, MA, TN, TX, VA
SANDERS: CO, MN, OK, VT 
TRUMP: AL, AR, GA, MA, TN, VA, VT
CRUZ: OK, TX  <<< vote flipping from Trump to Rubio in Texas, more than one report of it.  
RUBIO: MN
 
2016 Presidential Primaries Results
 
 
 
 
 
 
A Super Goodnight
 
post-5-0-95171200-1456902205_thumb.jpg
 
 

That’s a wrap, everyone! It was certainly a super night for Clinton. It was semi-super for Trump. If you want to relive the Super Tuesday results chronologically, click here to start at the beginning of our live blog and scroll up.

We’ll have a lot more to say on what the Super Tuesday results mean for Cruz, Rubio, Kasich and Sanders for you to chew over with your morning croissant. In the meantime, though, here’s where things stand as we shut the lights off on this live blog:

snip

 

http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/super-tuesday-primaries-presidential-election-2016/

 

Republican Delegates 
Needed to win nomination: 1,237
Donald Trump: 274  Ted Cruz: 149  Marco Rubio: 82  John Kasich: 25  Ben Carson: 8  Jeb Bush: 4  Carly Fiorina: 1  Mike Huckabee: 1  Rand Paul: 1  Not yet allocated: 1,927
 
 
Democratic Delegates 
Needed to win nomination: 2,383
Hillary Clinton: 1,001 (includes 457 superdelegates)Bernie Sanders: 371 (includes 22 superdelegates)Not yet allocated: 3,393
 
  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More Bad News for Marco Rubio: He Just Lost the Support of Fox News

March 2, 2016

Gabriel Sherman

 

 

"In his role as the donor class's darling, Marco Rubio has enjoyed support from the Republicans' media arm, Fox News. Throughout the primary, Fox provided Rubio with friendly interviews and key bookings, including the first prime-time response to Barack Obama's Oval Office address on ISIS. Many of the network's top pundits, including Stephen Hayes and Charles Krauthammer, have been enthusiastic boosters. Bill Sammon, Fox's Washington managing editor, is the father of Rubio's communications director, Brooke Sammon. 

 
But this alliance now seems to be over. According to three Fox sources, Fox chief Roger Ailes has told people he's lost confidence in Rubio's ability to win. "We're finished with Rubio," Ailes recently told a Fox host. "We can't do the Rubio thing anymore." 
 
Ailes was already concerned about Rubio's lackluster performance in GOP primaries and caucuses, winning only one contest among the 15 that have been held. But the more proximate cause for the flip was an embarrassing New York Times article revealing that Rubio and Ailes had a secret dinner meeting in 2013 during which the Florida senator successfully lobbied the Fox News chief to throw his support behind the "Gang of 8" comprehensive immigration-reform bill. "Roger hates seeing his name in print," a longtime Ailes associate told me. "He was appalled the dinner was reported," the source said. "
snip
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubio Gets Establishment Kiss of Death

March 2, 2016

Edmund Kozak

 

"Some of Marco's latest endorsements are bound to help Trump more than him"

 

"Sen. Marco Rubio is racking up endorsements that may do little more than confirm to the GOP base that he is the kind of Establishment Republican they are attempting to overthrow.

 
Rubio’s embrace by hoary Republican elites may turn out to be a death hug he will wish he had avoided.
 
Former Sen. Bob Dole is perhaps the most prominent example of the problem. Dole — famous for losing to Bill Clinton and being the butt of “SNL” jokes — has an apparent desire to see conservatives purged from the GOP. In 2012, he authored a letter viciously attacking conservative candidate Newt Gingrich, and in an interview in early February called conservative stalwart Ted Cruz an “extremist.”
 
Dole also co-founded the Bipartisan Policy Center in 2007. Bipartisanship is a lovely idea in principle, but when the reality is that the political “center” is about twelve steps to the left — and even moderately conservative ideas are derided by liberals and the media as racist or sexist or bigoted — bipartisanship is a mere code word for capitulation.
 
Dole was a vocal Jeb supporter until the Bush dynasty’s heir apparent finally suspended his sad, unsuccessful campaign.
 
Sen. Orrin Hatch, another refugee from the Jeb Bush bandwagon, has some strong conservative stances on states’ rights and the federal budget, he is worryingly weak on immigration. Hatch is a vocal supporter of H-1B visas and was an architect of their expansion. He also co-authored the DREAM act.
snip
 
An endorsement from Establishment standard-bearer Jeb Bush, who recently withdrew from the race after what will likely go down as one of the most poorly fought primary campaigns in history, could also be imminent. Rubio told reporters the two had spoken and will meet in the near future.
 
But if and when they do finally sit down together, Rubio may find himself asking Bush to keep his mouth shut."
 
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OVER 68K PEOPLE CALL FOR BILL CLINTON’S ARREST OVER ALLEGED ELECTIONEERING ON SUPER TUESDAY

March 3, 2016

 

 

"A petition calling for the arrest of former President Bill Clinton for alleged election law violations has gained over 60,000 signatures. He made appearances at three polling precincts in Massachusetts on Super Tuesday. State officials said he acted legally.

 
“This is a call for the immediate arrest of President Bill Clinton for clear, knowing and egregious violation of the campaign laws to swing an election in a significant way,” said the petition to Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey.
 
“It could not be any clearer in the Massachusetts General Laws…[prohibiting] campaigning within 150 feet of a polling station…Clinton was not only electioneering within the boundary…photos and video show him greeting and talking up election workers inside,” added the petition."
snip
  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really honestly hope Clinton's email escapades do catch up with her before election.  I cannot believe she is innocent in any way, shape or form.  Personally, I do not want a president to be someone who lies and cheats as do the Clinton clan.  I also don't want Trump.  It's unreal how our great country has come to the point it is now and this old, tired, grouchy, lying group of people are the ones we have to chose from. 

 

At any rate, here is an example of one of the reasons for making short order of Qadaffi.  GOLD.  I'm sure there are plenty more.  Makes sense to me.

 

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2016/03/hillary-clinton-real-story-behind.html

 

Now that I think of it, perhaps Ambassador Stephens was "collateral damage."

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comments following this post in RMN suggests that not all believe this with comments like, but Trump is against Islamic Invasion and Horse Pucky - but there is something about Trump that doesn't flow with me and I am not sure about his real intent in running for President.

Reader: Donald Trump: secret Jesuit agent for Commander-in-Chief?

Posted By: RumorMail [send E-Mail]

Date: Saturday, 5-Mar-2016 13:39:19

In Response To: The Pope Francis says ‘Arab invasion’ is social fact ... and a good thing (RumorMail)

From Reader Floyd.

Donald Trump has been the subject of media frenzy as of late. It seems that a considerable amount of those who subscribe to alternative sources of information are Trump supporters. They see him as some kind of rebel, going against both the Republican and Democratic parties (as exemplified by his recent non-commitment to support the Republican nominee for President).

Could it be though, that Donald Trump is a "false flag candidate" being used to secure the vote of the ever-increasing independent constituency in order to inevitably lull the US into a false sense of positive political novelty and thus to subsequently impose Jesuitical right-wing fascism leading to a nation-wide race war as devised by the masters of class adversarialism, the Sons of Loyola?

It very well could be. Here is why:

Trump claims to be Presbyterian, yet he attended Jesuit Fordham University for two years and then transferred to the covertly Jesuit-controlled University of Pennsylvania. 1

The University of Pennsylvania is funded by various Papal Court Jews, notably by The Annenberg Foundation, 2 started by Papal Knight and hofjude Walter Hubert Annenberg. Annenberg briefly attended the University of Pennsylvania in his youth and later established the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Annenberg is a Knight Commander of the Order of St. Gregory the Great. 3 , 4

Court Jew David L. Cohen is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania as well as an alumnus of University of Pennsylvania. He is also the executive vice president of Comcast. 5 He was recently named co-chairman of the leadership planning committee of the Roman Catholic World Meeting of Families in Philadelphia (which is the coming of the Pope to Philadelphia!) 6

University of Pennsylvania could be renamed "Hofjude University" because of its enormous amount of Papist Jewish funding and leadership and really the entire Pennsylvania area is controlled by the Roman Catholic hierarchy via the Jesuit provincial holding jurisdiction over Pennsylvania, the Archbishop of Philadelphia and the Bishop of Pittsburgh in conjunction with the temporal coadjutor government officials produced from UPenn and the following Roman Catholic or Catholic-funded Universities: La Salle University, Duquesne University, Pennsylvania State University, Villanova University, Temple University and Saint Joseph's University.

Protestants do not attend Roman Catholic institutions, especially counter-reformation Jesuit institutions like Fordham University, so Trump is at the very least an apostate for having done that. However, the story does not end with Trump.

Out of the five children he has, the three listed on Wikipedia have attended the following schools: 7 , 8 , 9

Donald John Trump, Jr. - Alma mater: University of Pennsylvania

Ivanka Marie Trump - Alma mater: University of Pennsylvania

Eric Frederic Trump - Alma mater: Georgetown University

There you have it; Trump, in addition to being affiliated with both Jesuit Fordham and covertly Jesuit UPenn, has at least three children who are all alumni of UPenn and notorious Jesuit Georgetown University!

Whether it be Trump, Jeb Bush, Hilary Clinton or even Bernie Sanders that ends up winning the 2016 election, all of these candidates are connected to Rome and all will only serve to implement the tyrannical, neo-Romanist policies of the Papacy and its professed soldiers of the Society of Jesus.

Sources:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

2. http://peoplesupportingpenn.upenn.edu/pspSection/?section=BFS

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Annenberg

4. http://www.papalhonorees.org/gregmmbcom.htm(note: the middle initial is incorrect; it is erroneously written as "Walter J. Annenberg")

5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_L._Cohen

6. http://ncronline.org/news/people/archbishop-says-2015-meeting-can-help-transform-families-communities

7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump,_Jr.

8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump

9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Trump

Source http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=41794

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill Bennett On Donald Trump (Why The Dogs of Hell Have Been Unleashed)

Posted By: CrystalRiver

Date: Saturday, 5-Mar-2016 08:43:46

Bill Bennett On Donald Trump

From James Fetzer

3-5-16

William J. Bennett, Host of Bill Bennett's Morning in America Show, is one of America's most important, influential, and respected voices on cultural, political, and education issues. He has one of the strongest Christian world views of any writer in modern times.

What I See Happening In a Trump Presidency

By Bill Bennett

3-5-16

They will kill him before they let him be president. It could be a Republican or a Democrat that instigates the shutting up of Trump.

Don’t be surprised if Trump has an accident. Some people are getting very nervous: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Jon Corzine, to name just a few.

It's about the unholy dynamics between big government, big business, and big media. They all benefit by the billions of dollars from this partnership, and it's in all of their interests to protect one another. It's one for all and all for one.

It’s a heck of a filthy relationship that makes everyone filthy rich, everyone except the American people. We get ripped off. We’re the patsies. But for once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media, and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened.

Donald Trump can self-fund. No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business, and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart.

It's no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy The Donald. It's because most of the other politicians are part of the a good old boys club. They talk big, but they won’t change a thing. They are all beholden to big-money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations, and multinational corporations ­ like Big Pharmacy or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock, stock, and barrel by foreigners like George Soros owns Obama or foreign governments own Hillary and their Clinton Foundation donations.

These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But there's one man who isn't beholden to anyone. There's one man who doesn't need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the teacher's union, or the Service Employees International Union, or the Bar Association to fund his campaign.

Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn’t need anyone’s help. That means he doesn’t care what the media says. He doesn’t care what the corporate elites think. That makes him very dangerous to the entrenched interests. That makes Trump a huge threat to those people. Trump can ruin everything for the bribed politicians and their spoiled slave masters.

Don’t you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama? Don’t you wonder why John Boehner and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama? Don’t you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to de-fund Obamacare or Obama’s clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens? Bizarre, right? It defies logic, right?

First, I'd guess many key Republicans are being bribed. Secondly, I believe many key Republicans are being blackmailed. Whether they are having affairs, or secretly gay, or stealing taxpayer money, the National Security Agency knows everything.

Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew he was withdrawing large sums of his own money from his own bank account. The NSA, the SEC, the IRS, and all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They surveil everything. Thirdly, many Republicans are petrified of being called racists, so they are scared to ever criticize Obama or call out his crimes, let alone demand his impeachment. Fourth , why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you’re a good old boy, you’ve got a $5 million-per-year lobbying job waiting. The big-money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose, they win.

But Trump doesn’t play by any of these rules. Trump breaks up this nice, cozy relationship between big government, big media, and big business. All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the Presidency. The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides but not Trump. Remember: Trump is the guy who publicly questioned Obama's birth certificate. He questioned Obama's college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university.

Now, he's doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do. He's questioning our relationship with Mexico; he's questioning why the border is wide open; he's questioning why no wall has been built across the border; he's questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; he's questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes, yet are not deported; and he's questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.

Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick. Good question! I'm certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare website. By the way, that tab is now up to $5 billion.

Trump will ask if Obamacare's architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. Trump will investigate Obama's widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama's college records. Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election. How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?

Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop Trump. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked, telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Trump could wake a sleeping giant.

Trump's election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute. He will not hesitate. Once Trump gets in and gets a look at the cooked books and Obama's records, the game is over. The jig is up. The goose is cooked.

Holder could wind up in prison. Jarrett could wind up in prison. Obama bundler Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money. Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails or for accepting bribes from foreign governments while Secretary of State, or for misplacing $6 billion as the head of the State Department, or for lying about Benghazi. The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison.

Obamacare will be de-funded and dismantled. Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters. Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved. That’s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.

Yes, it's become open season on Donald Trump. The left and the right are determined to attack his policies, harm his businesses, and, if possible, even keep him out of the coming debates. But they can't silence him. And they sure can't intimidate him. The more they try, the more the public will realize that he's the one telling the truth.

- See more at: http://rense.com/general96/bennettrump.html#sthash.mhRCnWwu.dpuf

-----------------------------

Dear RM Agents and Readers,

What is to add when it is already well stated.

Many Blessings,

CrystalRiver

Source http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=41777

Reader on Bill Bennett and My Reply

Posted By: CrystalRiver

Date: Saturday, 5-Mar-2016 18:01:36

In Response To: Bill Bennett On Donald Trump (Why The Dogs of Hell Have Been Unleashed) (CrystalRiver)

Please pass this to Crystal:

several years ago, Mr. Bennett had appointed himself ajudicator of the

state of morality in the U.S. until Cathy Obrien's claims surfaced about

him. You can read them here

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon08.htm

near the end of the excerpts following the subtitle "E.T. Phone Rome".

He became very quiet after that for several years, and if the charges are

true, it is easy to understand why.

It seems that one should use caution when listening to anything that he

has to say about anything that matters.

Source http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=41806

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judge Warns Hillary "Should Be Terrified" After Justice Grants Email-Staffer Immunity

 

The Justice Department has granted immunity to a former State Department staffer, who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, as part of a criminal investigation into the possible mishandling of classified information, according to a senior law enforcement official.

 

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-03/judge-warns-hillary-should-be-terrified-after-justice-grants-email-staffer-immunity

 

 

she has reportedly threatened a sort of 'information samson option' - if she is indicted, she will reveal all of her shady deals which are widespread and heinous enough to bring down the federal government.

to which i say, 'bring. it. on.'

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/48tx28/judge_warns_hillary_should_be_terrified_after/

 

 

none of the above are my words....

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know who Bill Bennett is, but I am watching Trump and Hillary very close, and I guarantee you, that Trump definitely has people scared.  Dirty tricks are in play everywhere. from the lies told by Megyn Kelly, in the last de bait, to the crap being posted by the newspapers, to the s*** going on with the voting. Votes switching to a candidate the voter didn't vote for. When he is 24 points ahead of anyone, and loses, something is being manipulated.  I too am concerned for his well being.   

 

When it comes to Hillary, apparently a grand jury has been seated, Loretta Lynch has been warned not to drag her feet on an indictment, the guy who calls himself Gucifer, from Romania, who broke into her servers, got his hands on secret material, has been offered immunity, and is perfectly willing to come here to testify.  Also read that the intelligence agencies are going into big time revolt, if she's allowed to get away with it. 

 

Definitely a most interesting election year.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if its me, but I have looked at all the Candidates, both Republican and Democrat and there doesn't seem to be one that jumps out at me or looks like they would be a good President. Maybe none of them wins?

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jessica, Clyde Lewis has a theory something along those lines where if there is no clear frontrunner for the convention, a new candidate will be positioned to swoop in on the convention floor.

Here's an excerpt from his article:

I had a discussion about this with my roommate Roger this morning and I said many people are assuming that since Trump has a lead in the polls, he will most certainly get the nomination, however, the conspiracy theory brewing is indicating that you shouldn’t place any bets on the outcome of this election, just yet.

Remember, if you are a thinker and a true conspiracy theory believer, you have to concede that the left wing and the right wing enable the bird of despotism to fly high and drop this nation right into the toilet.

The elite will move more than heaven and earth to make sure that the candidate they want takes the helm of the presidency. They will either rig it for the dynasty darling of Hillary or a suitable candidate that can appear through what is called, a brokered convention.

Currently, Trump, Cruz, and Rubio are the party’s national front-runners. The large field behind them, however, makes it possible that no one will emerge with a lead sizable enough to win on the first ballot. If that happens, we will have a contested convention and possibly a brokered nominee.

It would be all about how the nominee is chosen rather than the actual nominee. If this happens, it would be a political nightmare. Almost 85 percent of Americans were not yet born the last time either party had such a contest.

For Democrats, that was in 1952 when it took three ballots to nominate Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson. The GOP’s last multi-ballot convention occurred four years earlier in 1948. New York Governor Thomas Dewey won that one, also after three ballots.

Since 1952, no convention has gone beyond the first ballot.

For people who aren’t aware that this can be done, it will come as a shock and might even spark more conspiracy theories about a rigged election. This will divide the people even more and aggravate the people who have in their gullibility stood behind populist and authoritarian candidates that have beat out the candidates favored by the establishment elite.

Now keep in mind, so far this is only a conspiracy theory, albeit a conspiracy theory that may have some legs.

According to an article published in Utah’s Deseret News, there has been a rumor behind the scenes of a candidate ready to swoop down on the convention floor to save the day.

I’ll bet you can guess who that candidate is.

Lately, we have been hearing a lot from Mitt Romney about everything from possible taxes not being reported by Trump, to picking at Trump for not rebuking the endorsement of David Duke and the KKK.

Romney Tweeted to Trump the following, he said: “A disqualifying & disgusting response by @realDonaldTrump to the KKK.

His coddling of repugnant bigotry is not in the character of America.”

This prompted another tweet from the Conservative Vine, stating:“You are attacking Donald Trump harder than you attacked Obama. Wait a minute, you never attacked Obama.”

Doesn’t anyone find it just a little odd that a man who decided not to run for the presidency in 2016 is now becoming that “go to” man for attacks against Trump?

Can anyone now see or even want to speculate there is a conspiracy brewing to change the race and reintroduce Romney into the running?

Can you imagine the risk that would be and can you even fathom what kind of irreparable rift that would cause in the GOP?

He seems to be very vocal all of a sudden and there are a lot of people that would see him as a savior of the GOP, so the question is would it be a blessing or a disaster and is it all just an outrageous conspiracy theory that Mitt Romney even has a chance of just walking in and taking the nomination from both Cruz and Trump?

Now if it does happen, how will the conservatives handle an even greater division and the stealing of an election?

If the people want Trump, then they should have Trump, right?

Now observing more of a conspiratorial action that could be planned wouldn’t a rift in the party cause an all out feud that could very well be a reason to suspend the election, enabling another conspiracy theory to happen?

It is all just conspiracy theory right?

Have a happy taco Tuesday.

http://www.groundzeromedia.org/taco-supreme-tuesday/

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jessica   To me, I was on the fence about the Rep. contender, until that reverse speech you posted on Trump.  That he really loves this country and only has it's best interest at heart, is obvious.  He is also a very clever strategist.  Only have to watch how he does things to know that.  Self funding, no money from special interest groups, etc., is unheard of.  That the common man in this country is sick of the status quo, is evident from his support.  There was a lot of dirty election hi jinks going on yesterday in both Maine and Kansas.  What was done and what was wrong with it, is too much to go into. That the establishment is in an uproar, is only too obvious, that they would commit political suicide, instead of getting behind the front runner, tells the story of their desperation.  A corporation, like we have become, needs a savvy businessman to run it, but desperation, brings about desperate acts, and we, the people, get to pay for it.  The people have spoken, but once again, they are being ignored.                

 

 

@kandescent  imo, IF they are that desperate, and stupid enough to go down that path, then god help us all, period.  Trump did not get where he is, by sharing their stupidity.  Yes, there is a conspiracy going on against Trump, it is obvious and blatant,  with the media moguls right in the thick of it, for without the likes of the NYTimes, Wash Post, involved, it would not be possible.  Without the likes of Bill Gates, MIcrosoft, easily manipulated voting machines, it would not be possible.  No exit polls published last night, since when?  Always exit polls, always.  so were they busy changing the votes?

David Rockefeller back in 1991 thanked that same media, for remaining silent, for without their cooperation, he and those like him could not have furthered their own agenda.  These same media that are now complicit in the agenda of stopping Trump, to the point of destroying their own party, and to hell with the people they are supposed to represent, to hell with the people's will.  Romney, that loser? LOL  Surely they cannot be that stupid, on second thought, yes they are!

 

In the meantime, let's not take our eyes off the Democrats, and what they are up too, while all this attention is focused on the Republicans.  Let's not miss that Obama has ordered B 52 bombers to fight ISIS in Syria.  Let's not miss that patriots who took a stand against the BLM are being rounded up all over the country. Let's not forget that the treachery of Hillary in Lybia/BenGhazi/Gaddafi/Ambassador Smith's death,/Confidential emails etc.,  is at her door, yet she will most likely walk. The policies of Obama, Common Core, NDAA, TPP, Obamacare, Immigration, Scalia's death, even, is at his door.  I, for one, am sick of them all.

 

Mitt Romney praises donald trump in 2012

 

 

 

 

Romney Trashing Trump    2016

 

 

uh huh, gonna shoot themselves in the foot, once again  lol

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who Is The Real Ted Cruz?

from January 26, 2016

Roger Stone

 

 

"Vladimir Lenin said, “There are no morals in politics; there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.”

 

I can’t think of a better description of Ted Cruz’s relationship with the DC-Wall Street Establishment – Cruz being the scoundrel of course. Cruz’s claim of not being a tool of the political elite is like Bill Clinton telling the world, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”

Webster’s definition of a scoundrel is a dishonest or unscrupulous person, and Cruz has become quite adroit at saying one thing while his history shows him doing the other. Rather than the outsider he claims to be, Ted Cruz is the ultimate insider, former top Bush 41 policy aide and globalist, Ivy Leaguer, and establishment insider.

Not many conservatives coming out of Princeton and Harvard. “I’m just sayin,'” Ted, as said in the debate.

There is no better example of this than Calgary Ted’s actions surrounding the big Wall Street banks and their secret funding of his political ascension. Cruz has been gorging at the table of the ultimate insider of all insiders – Goldman Sachs and Citibank .

You may recall in a recent Fox Business Network debate that Cruz, in Mr. Haney from Green Acres voice, declared to one of the moderators, “The opening question [moderator Jerry Seib] asked — would you bailout the big banks again — nobody gave you an answer to that. I will give you an answer — absolutely not.”

What else would you expect a scoundrel to say who had secretly secured big sweetheart loans from Goldman and Citibank — by leveraging his retirement accounts –– to fund his 2012 U.S. Senate campaign. Loans which the Calgary Ted conveniently forgot to disclose to the Federal Election Commission. These are the very retirement accounts that he said he and his wife said he cashed in to fund his senate race. In other words, Ted lied.

At the same time Ted’s bulging 2016 campaign accounts and supporting Super-PACs are stuffed with big oil and gas money. He knows how to play the game."

snip

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/26/who-is-the-real-ted-cruz/#masthead



 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems I made a comment up above regarding Trump's abilities>>"He is also a very clever strategist."  uh huh uh huh 

 

Since Hillary IS running for President, it is fair to let you know just how serious that email business of hers is.  I was kind of floored. This IS truly serious business!

 

What YOU Need To Know 
About Hillary's SAP Emails
A SAP Compromise Could Bring Life In Prison
 
By Maj Ed Coet, US Army (Ret)
Courtesy Capt Les Horn, USN (Ret)
3-4-16 
 
"My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany. In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news. Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:
 
1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.
 
2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.
 
3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.
 
4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.
 
5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.
 
6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.
 
7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.
 
As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could -- but without doubt would -- cause serious damage to our national security.
 
If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.
 
If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up ­- so grave is this security violation.
 
If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution ­- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government. If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is true to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.
 
If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA -- and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information - period.
 
Ed Coet 
Major, US Army (Retired) 
 
 
Pagliano’s immunity deal could indicate grand jury probe into Clinton email server  << March 3, 2016
 
Hacker 'Guccifer,' who uncovered Clinton's private emails, to be extradited to US
 
So then, what does this end up doing to the election
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Five tough questions for Marco Rubio

March 9, 2016

Jonathan Swan

 

 

 

"Marco Rubio’s presidential campaign is on life support after a terrible night in Tuesday’s primaries.
 
His home state of Florida’s winner-take-all contest on March 15 is shaping up as a last stand for the senator, who failed to earn a single delegate on Tuesday.
 
Few close to Rubio can be cheery about his prospects, and the candidate, an overwhelming favorite of the Republican establishment, is now facing some uncomfortable questions — starting with Florida’s primary.  
Should he stay in the race and fight it out in Florida?
 
If Rubio goes down to a humiliating defeat in Florida, some argue it could be curtains on his future political career.
 
Others say it would look nearly as bad to drop out before fighting in his home state.
 
Rubio’s campaign has put on a brave face, insisting he will take his campaign to Florida.
 
A conservative leader with strong ties to Rubio and the GOP donor community told The Hill in a telephone interview on Wednesday that the feeling within the Rubio camp is that if he drops out, he’ll hand Florida’s 99 delegates – and possibly the nomination – to Donald Trump. 
 
“He’s absolutely staying in through Florida,” the source said."
snip
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×