Jump to content
The CHANI Project Conspiracy Forum
NexusEditor

A CHRONICLE OF THE WORLD AT WAR III (The Buildup )

Recommended Posts

Pentagon paid PR firm $540mn to make fake terrorist videos

October 2, 2016

 

 

"The Pentagon paid a UK PR firm half a billion dollars to create fake terrorist videos in Iraq in a secret propaganda campaign exposed by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

 

PR firm Bell Pottinger, known for its array of controversial clients including the Saudi government and Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet’s foundation, worked with the US military to create the propaganda in a secretive operation.
 
The firm reported to the CIA, the National Security Council and the Pentagon on the project with a mandate to portray Al-Qaeda in a negative light and track suspected sympathizers.
 
Both the White House and General David Petraeus, the former general who shared classified information with his mistress, signed off on the content produced by the agency.
snip
The Bell Pottinger operation started soon after the US invasion of Iraq and was tasked with promoting the “democratic elections” for the administration before moving on to more lucrative psychological and information operations.
 
Former employee Martin Wells told the Bureau how he found himself working in Iraq after being hired as a video editor by Bell Pottinger. Within 48 hours, he was landing in Baghdad to edit content for secret “psychological operations” at Camp Victory.
 
The firm created television ads showing Al-Qaeda in a negative light as well as creating content to look as though it had come from “Arabic TV”. Crews were sent out to film bombings with low quality video. The firm would then edit it to make it look like news footage."
snip
  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Army Chief Issues Stark Warning to Potential Enemies

October 5, 2016

Matthew Cox

 

 

"The U.S. Army's chief of staff on Tuesday issued a stern warning to potential threats such as Russia and vowed the service will defeat any foe in ground combat.

 
"The strategic resolve of our nation, the United States, is being challenged and our alliances tested in ways that we haven't faced in many, many decades," Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley told an audience at the Association of the United States Army's annual meeting in Washington, D.C.
 
"I want to be clear to those who wish to do us harm … the United States military -- despite all of our challenges, despite our [operational] tempo, despite everything we have been doing -- we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before. Make no mistake about that."
 
Milley's comments come during an election year in which voters will decide a new president and commander in chief -- and a period of increased military activity of near-peer competitors, including Russia and China.
snip
The general warned that future warfare with a near-peer adversary will "be highly lethal, unlike anything our Army has experienced at least since World War II."
 
"Our formations will likely have to be small; we will have to move constantly," he said. "On the future battlefield, if you stay in one place for longer than two or three hours, you will be dead."
 
Despite the challenges, Milley said the Army will adapt to survive such a dangerous battlefield.
 
"It's a tall order for sure -- to project power into contested theaters, fight in highly populated urban areas, to survive and win on intensely lethal and distributed battlefields and to create leaders and soldiers who can prevail. Tough? Yes. But impossible? Absolutely not," Milley said.
 
"Make no mistake about it, we can now and we will … retain the capability to rapidly deploy," he said, "and we will destroy any enemy anywhere, any time."
 
 
SMH  too bad it isn't only about the ones fighting, but also the populations who live in those urban areas as well, who matter.  I find I can't share or support this General's enthusiasm for death and destruction.
  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy is getting pissed (off...for a proper Aussie expression), methinks...

No wonder.

How many lives are lost and threatened while things don't become concrete....

 

RAISING THE STAKES: Putin slams US nuke threat with ultimatum

 

http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/10/raising-stakes-putin-slams-us-nuke.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FortRuss+%28Fort+Russ%29

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Russia will take down any American airplane or missile targeting Syrian army!

 

 

 

Russia Asked to Intervene in Libya: Gaining Clout in Middle East

from Sept. 30, 2016

Peter Korzun

 

 

"Libya's military leader Khalifa Haftar, the commander of the Libyan National Army loyal to the Tobruk-based House of Representatives (HoR), has requested Russia to end its arms embargo on Libya and begin supplying weapons and military equipment to eastern Libyan forces.

 
According to Russian newspaper Izvestia, Abdel Basset Badri, Haftar’s special representative who also serves as Libya's ambassador to Saudi Arabia, visited Moscow on September 27 to deliver the request addressed to both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.
 
Mr. Badri held talks with Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov, Russian newspaper Izvestia reported, citing a diplomatic source familiar with the situation.
 
The agenda included the prospects for lifting the embargo on arms supplies, including warplanes. More importantly, General Haftar asked Russia to start an anti-Islamist military operation in Libya similar to the one in Syria.
 
The toppling of long-term leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011 led to a power vacuum and instability in Libya, with no authority in full control. The country is divided between two governments: the HoR in the east of the country and the Gov­ernment of National Accord (GNA), which moved to Tripoli in March 2016 and set up its headquarters in a heavily-guarded naval base.
 
A large part of Tripoli is still held by Islamists. The division prompted the Unit­ed Nations to launch negotiations aimed at forming a unified gov­ernment and army to face the growing threat of terror groups. In September, Libya's rival governments were reported to have reached a "consensus" on the main elements of a political agreement.
 
Parts of Libya are outside of government's control, with various Islamist, rebel, and tribal militias administering some cities and areas. The existence of two competing governments and the lack of stability allow militants, including the Islamic State (IS) group, to operate on Libyan soil.
 
In March, 2015, the HoR appointed General Haftar commander of the Libyan National Army (LNA). The military leader has been part of the Libyan political scene for about half a century. Around 1990 he went into exile to the United States after a failed attempt to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. In the 1970s, Haftar received military training in the Soviet Union. The general speaks Russian language. After the start of the uprising against Gaddafi in 2011, the general returned to Libya where he became a key commander of the makeshift rebel force in the east."
snip
  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile, back at the ranch and outside of the election bs

Pentagon Hyping Test of Two Fake Nuke Bombs in Nevada Desert
October 8, 2016
 
 
"Amid efforts to modernize its nuclear stockpile, the US test-dropped two dummy nukes in the Nevada desert earlier this month.

 

With the United States’ Minuteman II intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBMs) arsenal aging, the US Air Force has pushed the Pentagon to fund nuclear modernization programs.
 
To that end, the Air Force conducted successful tests with two B61 nuclear bombs. Neither carried a live warhead.
 
"The primary objective of flight testing is to obtain reliability, accuracy, and performance data under operational representative conditions," reads a statement released by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).
 
snip
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see where this one goes.

It does cause me to pause and wonder whether the missile destroyer launched any missiles as well.

*******

US Navy destroyer comes under missile attack off Yemen coast – Pentagon

Published time: 10 Oct, 2016 03:42

Edited time: 10 Oct, 2016 03:46

A missile fired from the Yemeni shore targeted a US Navy guided missile destroyer, a Pentagon spokesman has said. Two rockets, which failed to hit the ship, allegedly came from territory controlled by Houthi rebels.

https://www.rt.com/news/362194-us-ship-yemen-missile-attack/

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U.S. Caught Repainting Fighter Jets to RUSSIAN COLORS

October 9, 2016

 

"The United States has been caught repainting several of their fighter jets in RUSSIAN Air Force Colors.  Training?  Or are they preparing to launch a horrific bombing inside Syria, then blaming it on the Russians as a precursor to US military action inside Syria?

 
Remember history: On April 15, 1961, a group of Cuban exiles took off from Nicaragua in a squadron of American B-26 bombers, painted to look like stolen Cuban planes, and conducted a strike against Cuban airfields. So we have known for decades that the US federal Government is full of snakes and vipers.  Don't put anything past these filth.  
 
By repainting these fighter jets, they can send them out on bombing missions, make certain they fly low and slow around a target a few times so people on the ground whip out their cellphone cameras to video the attack, bomb the hell out of something and then sit back as all the civilian videos come out on social media showing a "Russian" plane committing the act!  The perfect set up.
 
Now that we're revealing this, look for someone to come out and claim it is for something like "training" but who needs to repaint planes for training?  We have all sorts of electronics to Identify Friend-Foe (IFF).  This enables us to fight at night, in bad weather . . . . zero visibility.  So why repaint a plane for "training?"  
 
Further, it isn't only ONE plane the US is repainting; it's quite a few!  Take a look at one below:
 
 
PICTURE7.JPG
 
snip
I'm not to sure about this source so take this post with a few grains of salt.  I wanted to post it, just because there's 2 current situations where something like this could be used.  So just in case either of them happens, this is here as a record.
 
  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to add a couple things to think about in regarding the repainting of planes.

 

On 9/11 E.Coast, NYC, DC etc. were attacked. A majority of us do not believe the official story and never will, but will we ever have the truth behind any of these events? It's doubtful. However 9/11 did manage to create the setting for our invasion of Iraq and the ME, which was the reason for the attack.  Basically, all major wars/conflicts, have been deliberately started via what we now call a "false flag" event. 

 

At the current time, we are all aware that Putin and Russia, are being blamed for anything and everything from the Wikileaks leaks, to the downing of MH 17, along with every misstep that takes place in Syria.  In short Putin/Russia are being demonized by Obama, Clinton, Kerry, et al, on a daily basis.  That it is happening is one thing, to the extent it's happening, I find curious.  Unless there are bigger plans afoot.

 

The situation in the states right now is pretty tedious.  Riots, police killings, shooting incidents regarding civilians, this 3 ring circus of an election we have going on, the popularity of Trump, and how there are those with money and power who want him stopped "at any cost", the illegal and treasonous past of one of our candidates, that absolutely zero is being done about, all the refugees being transported in, although we know nothing about who they might be,  our borders wide open to literally anyone, the horrendous national debt that simply cannot be maintained, our country being sold piece by piece to the highest bidder, the newly revived racism, our military totally being demoralized and undermined, by base closings, firings of hundreds of top officers right down to the point of pentagon paying for sex change operations.  On and on, but I digress.  In short, an explosive situation inside this country exists on more than one level.  A match in that tinderbox could ignite who knows what?

 

I'm reasonably confidant that most of you immediately thought about those repainted planes being used to cause a problem for Russia, in Syria.  My first thought also.  But perhaps the plan is even more devious.

 

I recall Sarah Palin making the comment that she could see Russia from her porch.  We all laughed, and figured what a loony.  Hang on just a second. That may not be so funny after all.  Alaska, our 50th State, separate and totally remote from the contingent 48 states where most of us live.  Alaska is approximately 55 miles from Russia across the Bering Strait.  55 miles, think about that, and while you do, also remember that so many AF bases, military bases, have been closed in Alaska, that they are considered to be virtually unprotected.

 

https://www.epa.gov/fedfac/base-realignment-and-closure-brac-sites-state

http://www.newsminer.com/news/alaska_news/army-announces-troop-cuts-alaska-bases-not-spared/article_61751f96-266b-11e5-b0e8-877497413710.html

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2005/10/27/house-section/article/H9293-2

 

 

Over the last few years, there have been reports of Russian planes being spotted off the coast of California. (I wonder if Russian?)

 

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/27/world/us-russia-bombers-intentions/

https://www.intellihub.com/unmarked-russian-air-force-jet-makes-erratic-passes-over-cali-before-disappearing-over-sacramento/

 

The point being here, that Alaska is far closer than California. These people make plans decades in advance, (Operation Northwoods from 1961 = 9/11) and IF we still do NOT have the truth about the assassination of JFK, nor 9/11, both of which took place in a major US city, in broad daylight, with thousands of witnesses, whatever would we hear about an attack on the US, in an area as remote as Alaska, by "Russian" planes??  

 

So we have deteriorated relations with Russia

Putin and Russia are to blame for everything

All the very conveniently engineered crisis in the states, at the current time, that "they" will do whatever is necessary, to get control of

"They" have been trying to get a real war started for years, as the Bankers need it, to survive.

Closed bases in Alaska leaving it basically unprotected

Fired top Military Officers

Russia 55 miles from Alaska

US planes repainted to look like Russian Planes

along with an unprotected and Major above ground oil pipeline    

 

disclaimer: Random thoughts posted, just in case we are told Russia attacked us. I figure "they" don't have long to carry out their plans and I truly hope I'm wrong, but certain things are making me wonder. Farfetched? Maybe, but it seems that's the norm, these days, as we observe more and more, that which we thought impossible.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything you hear about Aleppo is Wrong

Posted By: IZAKOVIC

Date: Monday, 10-Oct-2016 08:01:29

Saturday, 08 October 2016

What's really going on in Aleppo? Are Assad and Putin exterminating the population for sport? Is it a war against US-backed "moderates"? That is what the mainstream media would have us believe.

Ron Paul Liberty Report's Daniel McAdams speaks with Vanessa Beeley, a journalist who just returned from Aleppo for the real story...

Source:

Confirming much of what Vanessa details, TheAntiMedia's Darius Shahtahmasebi explains what you aren't being told...

As hawkish as presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton may be, the fact the Obama administration is pressing for direct war in Syria before she even has a chance to be elected raises serious questions about the urgency underpinning the U.S. establishment’s push to unseat Syrian president Bashar al-Assad from power.

Just this week, Russia deployed its S-300 surface-to-air missiles to Syria’s western coast in a move to preemptively counter any threat from U.S.-coalition airstrikes. The move came shortly after a number of reports surfaced in the corporate media claiming the Obama administration was mulling over attacking Syrian troops directly.

The U.S. coalition targeted Syrian troops as recently as September of this year in an attack which, according to Assad himself, lasted for over an hour. At least 80 soldiers were killed while another 100 or so were injured. An ISIS advance followed almost immediately.

No apologies or compensation were offered, and the U.S. barely seemed to flinch at the idea of 80 soldiers (who were battling ISIS militants) losing their lives as a result of their air strikes. The implication of this recent attack is that the U.S. will have no problem launching a similar offensive in the near future.

However, Russia has presented an issue for the sane members of the military-industrial complex because it has become increasingly clear the U.S. cannot intervene in Syria without dealing with Russia first. To date, the American government may have been playing a game of chicken with Russia to see what it might take for them to abandon the Syrian regime. However, if anything, Russia’s involvement in the Syrian conflict has only increased in recent years, and that doesn’t appear to be changing anytime soon.

In tandem with the deployment of the S-300 missiles, Russian General Igor Konashenkov made it clear in a statement that “any missile or airstrikes on the territory controlled by the Syrian government will create a clear threat to Russian servicemen” and could be shot down by the S-300 defense system.

Given that the U.S. coalition is the only air force that poses a threat to the Syrian regime (the various terror networks in Syria don’t have an air force – at least not officially), the statement is clearly intended as a warning to their American counterparts.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, a mastermind of diplomacy, softened the tone of Konashenkov’s words by stating the missile systems were purely defensive and posed no threats to anyone. Most notable, however, was the fact Lavrov said this in a press conference with French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault (France is a staunch advocate of removing Assad, meaning Lavrov was essentially meeting with one of his biggest opponents in Syria).

Russia’s threats, whether sugar-coated or not, are more than an attempt to talk tough on the international stage. The Russian government is evidently taking this potential war seriously; it began emergency response exercises on Tuesday that included the participation of both government officials and citizens, according to the Russian government (it’s worth noting the details of this exercise were arguably exaggerated by Western media).

The United States, on the other hand, continues to play a dangerous game in pushing this war further than it needs to. The United States-led coalition has no legal basis to be operating militarily in Syria, whether through their own domestic legislative institutions or through the United Nations. Russian assistance was requested formally by the Assad regime, which currently holds the seat at the U.N. This gives the Russian campaign an air of legitimacy whether or not it is immoral.

Yet the United States continues to give itself a special privilege (which only Israel can rival) by insisting the U.S. military has the right to defend itself against Russian anti-missile defense systems within Syrian territory. Yet, they argue, the Syrian Government and its people do not have the right to defend itself against multiple ground and air invasions within their own country.

Though Western media continues to focus on Russia’s potential role in hacking U.S. elections and its faults in the Syrian conflict, the road to war the US leaders are taking will affect us all severely — meaning we cannot afford to have the so called media cover it irresponsibly.

Source of the entire article:

http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/30306/53/

---

IZAKOVIC

Source http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=58824

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Norway mulls US troop deployment on its soil – Defense Ministry

Published time: 10 Oct, 2016 18:08

Norway is looking at making a “long-standing US wish” come true by allowing American Marines to be placed on its soil, according to the Nordic nation’s Defense Ministry. The plans currently being discussed could reportedly see the deployment of 300 US Marines.

The US troops would be deployed to Norway “on a rotational basis,” but currently “there is no question of permanent deployment,” said Norwegian Defense Ministry spokeswoman Ann Kristin Salbuvik.

But planning is underway, and “assessments have taken place within the military to look at the options for additional training, storage and this kind of thing,” she told AFP.

According to Norwegian media, not much has been worked out aside from the number of Marines that would be stationed at the Vaernes military base near Trondheim. The plan for deployment has however been in the making for a while, according to several defense sources speaking to Norwegian newspaper Adresseavisen, and translated by the Local on Monday.

The deployment will reportedly take place about 600 miles (965km) from the border with Russia, which is in the Arctic Circle and spans 125 miles.

The plans may strain the already tense relationship with Moscow, as it breaks Norway’s promise not to deploy foreign troops on its territory – something it committed to in 1949, in response to Soviet fears. The promise was conditional on Norway not feeling threatened, although a later amendment was added which permits military drills to be carried out.

https://www.rt.com/news/362287-us-marines-norway-eu/

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia to build permanent Syrian naval base, eyes other outposts

October 10, 2016

Andrew Osborn

 

 

"Russia will create a permanent naval base in Syria to expand its military footprint in its closest Middle East ally, a government official said on Monday, a week after Moscow said it was considering reopening Soviet-era bases in Vietnam and Cuba.

 
The move, announced by Russian Deputy Defence Minister Nikolai Pankov, is further evidence Russia is building up its capabilities in Syria despite a partial drawdown in March and another sign it is digging in for the long haul to help prop up President Bashar al-Assad.
 
"By doing this Russia is not only increasing its military potential in Syria but in the entire Middle East," Senator Igor Morozov, a member of the upper house of parliament's International Affairs Committee, told the RIA news agency.
 
A Reuters analysis of publicly available tracking data shows Moscow has steadily built up its forces in Syria since a ceasefire collapsed in late September, doubling supply runs by air and sea.
 
The base plan, which will involve upgrading and expanding an existing naval facility at the port of Tartus which Moscow leases from Syria, is part of a push to expand or create a new military presence abroad.
 
The Izvestia newspaper said Moscow was also in talks to open an air base in Egypt, while the state-owned Rossiskaya Gazeta daily noted that Russia has said it wants bases in Venezuela, Nicaragua, the Seychelles and Singapore too.
 
At odds with Washington over Syria and Ukraine, Russia has engaged in a bout of saber-rattling in recent weeks, moving S-300 surface-to-air missiles to Tartus, nuclear-capable missiles to its European exclave of Kaliningrad, and reinforcing its Syria strike force.
 
snip
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember on the previous page I had some random thoughts??  I'm going to post a couple tweets I've picked up this am. Pay attn to that map of Russia's ICBM tests today.  

 

https://twitter.com/Liveuamap/status/786172087257878530

 

https://twitter.com/Liveuamap/status/786102330072657920

 

Heck I'll just snip and post it

 

    post-5-0-52756000-1476303837_thumb.jpg

 

Does anyone find that as interesting as I do?  Alaska is mighty close to that firing test line in regards to an ICBM.  Would our intelligence have picked up that planned testing?  uh huh, obviously yes, as they were tracking it.  So now we have a strange coincidence of Russia testing an ICBM and it being fired from deep inside Russia towards what we could always say was towards Alaska, that we have left unprotected. About those repainted planes, hmmm if they'd fire an ICBM that direction, would it be so hard to believe they might use planes to attack? I dunno, but this is getting interesting. I think  those in charge are capable of anything, and this almost looks like a case of a set up.   Yes, I hope I'm way off base here, I'd be pleased to be wrong.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reverse Speech Analysis

by Tiffany Fontenot of US Blaming Russia for Bombing Civilian Targets in Syria-Remarks With French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault (and Secretary of State, John Kerry,) Before Their Meeting—Treaty Room, Washington, DC, October 7, 2016

 

https://www.facebook.com/tifvision/posts/10154031756625878?comment_id=10154031895070878&notif_t=comment_mention&notif_id=1476354613580374

 

Thanks to generosity of Tiffany, she lets us share the entire content with everyone.

Here's what she had come to.

In the vid link above, the actual slowed and reversed speech works are shown.

 

"Reverse Speech Analysis by Tiffany Fontenot of US Blaming Russia for Bombing Civilian Targets in Syria-Remarks With French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault (and Secretary of State, John Kerry,) Before Their Meeting—Treaty Room, Washington, DC, October 7, 2016--http://www.state.gov/secretary/r

F1: JK- My [great pleasure to welcome] Jean-Marc Ayrault to Washington.
R1: Make a witness out there.
F = 0:00:31 to 0:00:37, R = 0:00:32 to 0:00:33
- Kerry introduces his intension at the very beginning of his speech the purpose for it which is to convince his audience of the information he has come to this press conference to announce. Kerry has come to make believers out of the witnesses to the press conference of the information he will be presenting.

F2: JK- The oldest alliance and [relationship with the United] States, and a great friend and partner.
R2: Now they do business. Shill 'em.
F = 0:00:44 to 0:00:50, R = 0:00:46 to 0:00:47
- The verb to shill means to act as an accomplice for a swindler as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others. It appears that the intent being presented in this reversal is to act in concert together to swindle.

F3: JK- Ah, ranging from Iran nu[clear agreements]...
R3: Slim your group.
F = 0:00:54 to 0:00:57, R = 0:00:56 to 0:00:57
- Internal dialogue where Kerry is telling himself to make the nuclear agreement group smaller in some way.

F4: JK- Uh, to Africa, and unrest [and terrorism to the Middle East to]...
R4: Must seal to this arachnid.
F = 0:00:57 to 0:01:03, R = 0:01:00 to 0:01:02
- Again another indication that Kerry has agreed to be an assistant to entrap others in a spider web that has to do with terrorism.

F5: JK- I very much appreciate [Frances partnership with respect to Syria.]
R5: Now you resist this absolute. Pleasure helps us now.
F = 0:01:15 to 0:01:22, R = 0:01:18 to 0:01:22
- There is resistance from France/JMA to assist in this affair, but Kerry suggests that it is best to try and make the best of the situation.

F6: JK- Last night, uh, the regime [attacked yet another hospital.] And, 20 people were killed and a hundred people were wounded.
R6: Saw her London aid. Disguised it.
F = 0:01:31 to 0:01:42, R = 0:01:36 to 0:01:38
- Incongruent reversal. Forward Kerry blames a regime and later in the forward speech says Russia is also to blame for bombing the hospital. But, his reversal says that London aided somehow, and that there was an attack that was disguised.

F7: JK- Last night, uh, the regime attacked yet another hospital. [And, 20 people were killed and a hundred people were wounded.]
R7: The new world will be through knot in the void. There will be the Elfnet. 
F = 0:01:31 to 0:01:42, R = 0:01:39 to 0:01:42
- Curious reversal. It’s clarity is not of highest quality, but seems to be important so I am documenting it here. Forward Kerry speaks of carnage of the innocent dying and wounded, (and earlier reversals indicate this bombing was caused from a disguised attack by someone or some group he has been an accomplice to.) The reversal could be speaking of the New World Order and something he terms “Elfnet.” Now in reverse speech, elves or gnomes are, “confusing mental messages; electrical signals in the brain that are not firing properly.” So, presumably Kerry may be referring to an entire network that is causing dysfunction in this way. A knot in the void may be something he feels as if there is no coming back from.

F8: JK- So, we look forward today [to a very frank conversation.]
R8: Yes, we're mocking our fear again.
F = 0:02:31 to 0:02:36, R = 0:02:34 to 0:02:36
- Incongruent reversal. He is pretending to have a discussion about Russia and the regime in Syria attacking humanitarian targets because he knows they are not doing these attacks.

F9: JK- ...to deal with this bombing of Aleppo, this siege in in in [the 21st Century] this entire siege of innocent people.
R9: Seduce us her help.
F = 0:02:53 to 0:03:03, R = 0:02:59 to 0:03:00
- The entire siege has been a seduction of help. As referenced before, the help does not appear to be positive help due to two mentions of entrapment in a web in his speech already. Seducing the fly to the spider.

F10: JK- I think it is important [for us to make it clear] publicly that if we cannot implement Minsk in the next months or arrive at a clear plan as to exactly how it is going to be implemented which we are working on, ah then it will be absolutely necessary to roll over the sanctions which is not our desire.
R10: Or else we can suffer.
F = 0:03:14 to 0:03:36, R = 0:03:15 to 0:03:17
- This forward and reverse speech makes a full sentence that helps it to be interpreted. “I think it is important [for us to make it clear] or else we can suffer.” Kerry believes that if the finger is not pointed squarely at a false enemy, then Kerry and his group will be the ones to suffer.

F11: JK- I think it is important for us to make it clear publicly that if we cannot implement Minsk in the next months or arrive at a clear plan as to exactly how it is going to be implemented which we are working on, ah then it will be absolutely neces[sary to roll over] the sanctions which is not our desire.
R11: To roll over, hear us.
F = 0:03:14 to 0:03:36, R = 0:03:32 to 0:03:33
- This is a partial mirror reversal where the same thing is said forward and backward. Mirror reversals are congruent. This reversal reiterates that his group will assess sanctions on the false enemy they have accused.

F12: JK- Uh, and I encourage France to work very closely with the EU 28, uh a political agreement.
R12: Steer which states surrender.
F = 0:03:50 to 0:03:58, R = 0:03:55 to 0:03:57
-With France’s assistance, Kerry’s group is using the EU to manipulate which states they want to surrender.

F13/14/15: JK- And finally, let me just extend, uh, [my very best wishes on behalf] of our country to uh Juan Ma, [President Juan Manuel Sant]os for winning the Nobel Prize for his courageous efforts [to try to bring peace to Columbia.]
R13: Viable solution said, "Hear them."
F = 0:04:10 to 0:04:24, R = 0:04:12 to 0:04:13

- R14: Is not slowing down. No reserve.
- F = 0:04:10 to 0:04:24, R = 0:04:16 to 0:04:17

- R15: They both would seek him in Auschwitz.
- F = 0:04:10 to 0:04:24, R = 0:04:22 to 0:04:24
-As the structure of the rest of this speech is discussing how Kerry’s group are manipulating others in favor of their own agenda, this set of reversals in the same sentence seem to also be continuing in that line. Kerry is very firm that he needs viable solutions for his group’s agenda because they are going full steam ahead on their plans with no reserves. It is also very telling that the Nobel Peace prize winner is referred to in reverse as someone that is sought out in Auschwitz. Auschwitz is a metaphor that entered our collective unconscious from WWII that means intense suffering.

F16: JK- I will be talking later today with former President Uribe (Columbia) [in efforts to try to find out how we can h]elp.
R16: And, if you want an elf in Auschwitz, you'll find it.
F = 0:04:40 to 0:04:46, R = 0:04:43 to 0:04:45
-This is the second time Kerry has used the elf metaphor and the Auschwitz metaphor in this speech. It seems clear that Kerry and his group will offer Uribe their brand of confusion and intense suffering to Columbia through Uribe.

F17: JK- [Thank you for being with us. JA- Merci.] Thank you very much, uh, John. I’m very happy to, to see you again.
R17: JMA- This French JK- solo made to freak out.
F = 0:04:50 to 0:04:56, R = 0:04:50 to 0:04:52
- This is a link reversal. It means that one statement is created by two or more people. It also has a word in French forward whose reversal is in English spoken by JMA. The rest of the statement is made by JK. Link reversals happen when rapport between the people making the statement is high. JMA seems to be nervous about what’s been going on, and Kerry is facilitating and is very attentive to his situation. We know this because earlier in the speech, he suggested that France was being coerced into this agenda, but that they should make the best of it. This statement seems to also reiterate that JMA is not comfortable with the French solo being played in this agenda, and is being forced somehow to “freak out” or do something it would not choose to do under normal circumstances.

F18: JK- Thank you for being with us. JA- Merci. [Thank you very much, uh,] John. I’m very happy to, to see you again.
R18: JMA- Must come bear witness.
F = 0:04:50 to 0:04:56, R = 0:04:52 to 0:04:53
- Again, information suggesting that JMA is being coerced into coming to Washington DC and giving this speech on camera with John Kerry before going in to have a meeting with him.

F19: JK- Thank you for being with us. JMA- Merci. Thank you very much, uh, John. [i’m very happy to, to see you again.]
R19: JMA- Mais egoiste (But selfish) moved deep by hurt.
F = 0:04:50 to 0:04:56, R = 0:04:54 to 0:04:56
- Part of the reversal is in French. This is an INcongruent reversal. JMA is NOT happy to see John Kerry again. He is upset. He is upset because he feels selfish and he has been deeply hurt by something.

F20: JMA- [so difficult situation, yeah, like you,] you explain in your speech.
R20: JMA-With doubt, I will share this rickety bus.
F = 0:05:10 to 0:05:16, R = 0:05:10 to 0:05:13
- Clearly JMA is agreeing to work with Kerry and the group Kerry is assisting, but he has doubts about it because it’s going against his better judgement. He does not feel comfortable with the plan.

F21: JMA- [My first issue] is the situation in Syria.
R21: JMA- Will she succomb?
F = 0:05:18 to 0:05:22, R = 0:05:18 to 0:05:20
- It is on JMA’s mind whether or not Syria will fall.

F22: JMA- And uh we prepared uh eh a draft for the [security council.]
R22: JMA- This mock the Turkish.
F = 0:06:14 to 0:06:20, R = 0:06:19 to 0:06:19
- It is on JMA’s mind that an action will somehow ridicule or deny the importance of Turkey."

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will add this, just in case from unity in shout and Reddwolf also

 

Air-Raid Sirens in San Diego and Tacoma; Fighter Jets Seen Scrambling, Reports of “Explosion Sounds”

October 13, 2016

 

http://www.newsprepper.com/air-raid-sirens-san-diego-tacoma-fighter-jets-seen-scrambling-reports-explosion-sounds/#.V___4PkrK01

 

 

http://beforeitsnews.com/self-sufficiency/2016/10/air-raid-sirens-in-san-diego-and-tacoma-fighter-jets-seen-scrambling-reports-of-explosion-sounds-2510880.html

 

Air Raid Sirens Reported San Diego, Fighter Jets Scrambling Tacoma, Explosion Sounds 

 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CIA Prepping for Possible Cyber Strike Against Russia

 

The Obama administration is contemplating an unprecedented cyber covert action against Russia in retaliation for alleged Russian interference in the American presidential election, U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.

 

Current and former officials with direct knowledge of the situation say the CIA has been asked to deliver options to the White House for a wide-ranging "clandestine" cyber operation designed to harass and "embarrass" the Kremlin leadership.

 

The sources did not elaborate on the exact measures the CIA was considering, but said the agency had already begun opening cyber doors, selecting targets and making other preparations for an operation. Former intelligence officers told NBC News that the agency had gathered reams of documents that could expose unsavory tactics by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

 

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/cia-prepping-possible-cyber-strike-against-russia-n666636

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill Holter writes: The Final Act will be World War

Posted By: NaturalWisdom
Date: Friday, 14-Oct-2016 16:08:52

 

 

Holter doesn't paint a very rosy
picture
in his latest geopolitical report on JSMineset.com.

The Final Act will be World War

by Bill Holter | Jim Sinclair's MineSet

Oct 14th, 2016

Click here

Sadly, I must write what follows and do not do it lightly. Over the years when writing, I have held little back. Nothing will be held back in this missive as we are on the brink of war because apparently we have lunatics in Washington (and elsewhere) far more insane than the inmates they oversee.

 

This past week has seen the lunacy shift several gears in only days. We see the U.S. pushing Russia for war everywhere. We recently stationed and commissioned live nuclear missiles in both Poland and Romania …along Russia border. I can only imagine the response were Russian missiles stationed in Cuba or even Mexico? Russia has taken this (and other moves) very seriously as their population of 40 million drilled last week for a nuclear attack. They have also stationed their S300 and S400 missiles in Syria.
U.S. warplanes will be on suicide missions should they aggress.

 

This is not “gut feel” or hunch, my conclusions are a result of actions. Yesterday we learned the RAF (British air force) instructed their pilots to shoot down Russian planes over Syria. We also know the U.S. recently painted several planes in Russian colors. Do you really believe this is for a drill? Or more likely some sort of false flag where eyewitnesses swear they saw MIGs with their own eyes attack some target?

 

We also learned yesterday that Philippine president Duterte has ordered the U.S. out and off their islands. In what world could this ever happen? He knows history and knows Marcos was killed for far less. Why is he emboldened?
Simply because he has cut a deal with China/Russia for his protection and that of the Philippines.

 

Other pieces to the puzzle include Russia calling for the return of their school children in foreign lands, Yemen recalling all of their worldwide ambassadors, and diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Russia are now dark. We also know “today is the day” that “military options” in Syria will be discussed by Obama and his advisors in Washington. I would first ask, why are we even in or around Syria? There has been no declaration of war by Congress, Syria has not “invited” us as they have the Russians, and there is no (bogus) U.N. resolution calling for our military intervention. On what grounds are we even in Syria?

 

I have said for quite a while, the odds of us having an election have been getting slimmer and slimmer. What would a hot war with a nuclear exchange do to the odds? Please understand this, for all of Donald Trump’s bad points, he has now taken on the both the Dems and Repubs as a “system”. For all intents and purposes, they are one and the same. He cannot be allowed to win because both the Clinton and Bush crime families will be exposed. Much of the crime has been financial and why our economy and markets are on the verge of collapse.

 

A war will serve to postpone/prevent an election so Trump nor anyone else will be able to move us back toward the rule of law. A war will also be blamed as the reason our economy and markets fall apart and completely seize up. It will be said, “our policies were working and would have worked …except for the war”.
Unfortunately, I believe kicking the table over is THE only option left.

 

I have had several readers write in to me after my last interviews and admonish me for not thinking this through correctly. They have chided me and I paraphrase, “they are not crazy and will not opt for war because no one wants to kill themselves or commit suicide. A nuclear war is suicide.” To this I would respond,
desperate people do desperate things.
They cannot allow their criminal activities to be exposed and will do anything to stop the truth from coming out. These people are so narcissistic they probably believe (and have prepared for) they can survive a nuclear war because they are such “superior human beings”. We are dealing with absolute delusion here folks, DO NOT underestimate the evil, nor the lengths these people will go to cover their tracks.

 

Others have chided me for talking about “war” yet not spelling out what it really means. War, and any nuclear exchange will mean your “life is over”. Americans located at ground zero will be the lucky ones as the survivors will die a slow death either from radiation or starvation. Do not fool yourself, the U.S. is broke, the aftermath of any exchange will leave the U.S. isolated and shut off from credit. The world will no longer accept dollars for trade and our trade deficit will no longer see containers of goods dropped off in exchange for dollars. “Distribution” will also break down with our financial markets, “goods” will not make it to store shelves and banks holding worthless dollars will not allow you access as their doors will be shut. Simply put, unless you can survive a world that goes back to 1900 and earlier, you will not survive. Ask yourself this, can today’s pampered population survive if I-phones and internet do not exist? It is a very hard hitting realism but understanding how far we have strayed from “self sufficiency” is an important concept to understand.

 

To finish, I believe there is still a chance to avoid global war …but will result in U.S. civil war. Even though the press is refusing to report on the Wiki dumps, I believe Mr. Putin (as demonized as he is) has the ability to stop the madness with a “truth bomb”. If Mr. Putin drops a gigantic truth bomb with absolute and incontrovertible proof, maybe war can be avoided. His truth bomb(s) will need to include everything from a to z. It must include proof of the rigging of markets, stolen and embezzled funds, stolen and rigged elections, drug running, illegal arms sales, and of course murder and assassinations.

 

Many of these truths are currently being revealed by WikiLeaks but not reported by any mainstream press and of course the dots not being connected by a very dumbed down public. We even learned of Justice Scalia’s “wet works” (assassination) yesterday via the e-mail dump …not even a Supreme Court Justice’s assassination warrants MSM coverage? In my opinion, Mr. Putin must dump what truth they have amassed and do so globally and as loud and flamboyantly as possible. Somehow, the information must be forced to be seen by an American public with blinders on. I believe the only way that war is avoided will be from a mass uprising and gross civil unrest of the U.S. population screaming ENOUGH!

Praying God’s mercy for us all,

Bill Holter

Source
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=59349

 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim Stone: Intel Suggests To Prepare To Duck And Cover...Diego Garcia Has HUGE Buildup In Progress...

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 14-Oct-2016 09:46:25

 

 

 

REMEMBER MY WAR POST FROM YESTERDAY? IT'S ON, SEE THIS!

The following was posted to a popular forum. I believe it is credible, and was probably a top secret "OOPS":

Anonymous posted:

"I rotate through Diego Garcia every 6 weeks to pull maintenance on uplink equipment as a private contractor.

 

Something big is going on, the island has more aircraft than anytime in the last 9 years. They have blocked off some access roads and are now parking aircraft on the road.

 

Barriers have been set up around the aircraft areas. Temporary barracks and hangers are popping up everywhere. A tent city full of AF and Navy maintenance personnel has also been set up.

 

I have never seen B1s and B2s there at the same time. Actually I have never seen more than 1 there at a time.

 

Security is nuts I had to show my id at least 8 times a day

 

My coworker is former AF and said they are like that when nukes are around. We counted over a dozen air refueling tankers on the ground. The airfield had a take off or landing every 15 minutes, very busy. When we flew out we waited in line for quite a while. We never had to wait in the past.

 

The Navy had the docks full of ships and 6 to 8 more were moored just off shore. We watched many pallets of bombs being off loaded from one ship.

There were a bunch of B-52's coming in that were painted flat black. I have not seen that before.

 

So are we headed to war again?"

 

My comment: B-52's are for large scale nuclear strikes only. One might think that such an old aircraft would be mothballed, but the B-52 never was because it is practically impossible to shoot down. They can take several direct missile strikes and keep flying. If they are at Diego Garcia,
WATCH
OUT.

 

It is strongly rumored that Obama has ordered the annihilation of the Syrian armed forces and that the decision as to when will be made tomorrow (Oct 14). Who knows what will happen then, but they don't send B-52's to Diego Garcia for nothing. WE ALL KNEW THEY'D DESTROY THE WORLD BEFORE THEY LET AMERICA SURVIVE BY ELECTING TRUMP, REMEMBER: IT IS THE JEWISH COMMUNITY DOING THIS, NONE ARE INNOCENT, AND THEY CANNOT BE SAFE AFTER HURTING US THAT BADLY. If they are safe, it would be an amazingly huge FAIL.

 

Also, He has blog posts suggesting all 33000 remaining emails released this weekend.

see site:
http://82.221.129.208/basepagel5.html

Source http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=59303

 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the last couple weeks, I ran across an article about a B-52 bomber having been taken out of mothballs.  hmmm.  when I do a search for that story I find that Minot, NDakota and Barksdale AFB in Louisiana are mentioned.  Anyone recall that incident?  Where 6 nukes were taken somehow "accidentally" from Minot AFB  and flew to Barksdale, and somehow they lost one.  6 nukes moved, only 5 found. It seems they've been taking B-52's out of mothballs for a while now, and Barkdale is an Air Reserve B-52 bomber base.  Now here they are on Diego Garcia and painted black?   Very interesting!

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

-snip-

 

Friendly nations do not go to war over ego – or non-issues. Consider these facts:

  • Interconnected Economies:

China is United States’ largest goods trading partner with $598 billion in total goods trade during 2015. Goods exports totaled $116 billion; goods imports totaled $482 billion. Chinese companies are expected to invest $20 billion to $30 billion in the United States in 2016, compared with $15 billion in 2015 and $11.9 billion in 2014. Despite the Ukraine/Crimea related sanctions, the bilateral America–Russia trade turnover in 2014 amounted to $29.2 billion, which is 7.2% higher in comparison with 2013. Russian exports to America was $18.5 billion, while American exports to Russia was $10.7 billion.

  • Partners in Space:

The government of United States cannot go on a full-scale war with Russia because its astronauts are depended on Russian Soyuz flights to reach the International Space Station. The Pentagon will need to buy up to 18 more Russian-built RD-180 engines to power rockets carrying U.S. military satellites into space until at least 2022. Though NASA is banned from engaging in bilateral agreements and coordination with China regarding space, it is in the interests of U.S. national security to engage in space cooperation with China.

  • Connecting People:

Beijing is on course to build a massive 8000-mile high-speed train line connecting China, Russia, Canada, and the United States via a 125-mile underwater tunnel for at least $2 trillion. The entire trip is expected to take two days, with the train traveling at an average of 220 miles per hour. On its part, Russia is planning the world’s greatest superhighway connecting the country’s eastern border with the American state of Alaska, crossing a narrow stretch of the Bering Sea that separates Asia and North America.

 

-snip-

 

http://anonhq.com/you-have-been-fooled-into-believing-wwiii-is-real-here-is-the-proof/

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U.S. Navy Launches New Space Age Stealth Destroyer Commanded by Captain James Kirk!

October 31, 2013

By: Joe Calandra Jr.

 

uss-zumwalt.jpg

 

 

On Monday, the U.S. Navy launched the biggest destroyer in the history of the American fleet.

 

The U.S.S. Zumwalt, named for the Chief of Naval Operations who served during the 70’s, set sail from Bath Iron Works in Maine this week, reports The Christian Science Monitor.

This behemoth warship is 610 feet long!  It has an 11,000-square foot flight deck and displaces 14,564 tons of water.

This destroyer is 100 feet longer than any other destroyer ever built by the American Navy and it displaces 50 more tons of water.

Its warheads have triple the range of the current Arleigh Burke Class’ weapons systems and the ship’s stealthy angular design also makes it far less noticeable on enemy radar.

snip

Read story here:

http://www.libertynews.com/2013/10/video-report-u-s-navy-launches-new-space-age-stealth-destroyer-commanded-by-captain-james-kirk/

below is a link to the video that did not seem to come up on my article.

http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=69016&siteSection=csmonitor&videoId=25278787

 

Tx ICanSeeAtoms

 

The US Navy officially welcomed its largest and most technologically advanced destroyer to the fleet Saturday as the USS Zumwalt was commissioned in Baltimore.

 
A Navy news release raves about the Zumwalt and its two sister ships, the Michael Mansoor and the Lyndon B. Johnson, both under construction at Bath Iron Works in Maine.
 
USS Zumwalt

Displacement: 15,995 metric tons

Length: 610 feet

Beam: 80.7 feet

Draft: 27.6 feet

Sustained speed: 30 knots

Crew: 147 plus 28-person aviation detachment

Armaments: 80 Advanced Vertical Launch System cells, 2 155 millimeter Advanced Gun System (AGS), 2 30 millimeter Close In Guns

 

Among the things that set the Zumwalt apart from its predecessors in the Arleigh Burke-class of destroyers:
-- A larger flight deck that enables operations with new F-35 fighters and MV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft;
-- Larger vertical launch missile tubes that can fire larger and more advanced land attack and anti-ship missiles;
-- An electrical power system that generates almost as much electricity as the nuclear power plants on aircraft carriers: "The ship can operate all of its systems and still generate enough electricity to power a small town," the Navy says,
-- The ability, with that extra power, to accommodate weapons of the future, such as electronic rail guns and laser.
 
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ISIS in the crosshairs: Battle for Mosul begins

By Ray Sanchez, CNN

Updated 6:53 PM ET, Sun October 16, 2016

The offensive to liberate Mosul from ISIS control has begun, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said in a televised statement early Monday.

The fight is expected to last weeks, if not months, and if the battles to wrest Falluja and Ramadi from ISIS' grip are indicators, Mosul will be a messy melee.

The assault's buildup has been ongoing for some time. US-led coalition and Iraqi forces have hammered ISIS targets with airstrikes for more than a year.

The Nineveh Liberation Operations Center, which was set up to coordinate the offensive, has brought in dozens of American and British advisers. A US artillery unit has provided cover for operations south of Mosul.

On ISIS' side of the fight, there have been reports of a growing network of tunnels leaving the city. The terrorist outfit has also allowed wounded fighters to leave Mosul and freed prisoners jailed for low-level offenses. The militants were also taking measures to combat the effectiveness of airstrikes.

Skirmishes flared outside Mosul in the days leading up to the battle, and Sunday brought several signs that the fight for Mosul was near, including an airstrike on one of the city's main bridges.

Not only did Abadi declare, "God willing, the decisive battle will begin soon," but leaflets proclaiming, "It's victory time," also rained over the city Sunday.

US playing supporting role

The 30,000-strong force tasked with recapturing the largest city under the terrorist group's control comprises many groups, with the Iraqi army and Kurdish Peshmerga making up the bulk.

Iraqi security forces are expected to lead the ground campaign with the backing of coalition airstrikes and advisers, US officials have said. The US recently announced the deployment of 600 additional troops to aid in the city's capture. The deployment brings the number of US personnel to more than 5,200, the Pentagon says.

"There are no major objectives after that. This is it. This is the last big holdout in Iraq for ISIL," said Navy Capt. Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, using another acronym for the terrorist group.

<snip>

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/16/middleeast/mosul-isis-operation-begins-iraq/index.html?sr=twCNN101616mosul-isis-operation-begins-iraq0654PMVODtop

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

kande,  remember when we first heard of the "hail mary" pass that our weakest enemies could throw  and potentially destroy our infrastructure ? stealth off shore sub  with small nuke and midrange missile. send it up, emp...stone age america. the new presidential executive order re space weather events, electro magnetic events et al can happen by solar , space , geo-magnetic {solar) but in reality may include this scientifically and statistically accepted possibility that the hail mary  pass would succeed. how many enemies with the capability of doing that are on the game board now. end game or play offs how likely is the rocket launch scheduled for tomorrow ... montana... did the u.s. win toss for game kick off ?

 

 

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×