• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


RenegadeSon last won the day on January 7

RenegadeSon had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,676 Excellent


About RenegadeSon

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
  • Interests
  1. Who was on the bus: Eliot Engel Adam Schiff Mark Takano Susan Davis Stephen Lynch Elaine Luria There might be one more since it was supposed to be seven congress types.
  2. They have my attention...
  3. Since we are talking about the term 'lost at sea', a couple of years ago when I first learned about this, I searched my own B/C number and SSN on I don't remember the exact number, but I... as a fiction... had somewhere around 15,000 companies that had invested in me...that is... me as a fiction. All together, those investments are worth many billions to the investment owners. Uniform Commercial Code. Governs everything.
  4. They are pointing out the big difference in the use of language. JFK jr was 'lost at sea' but not necessarily dead, if you consider the legal use of the language 'lost at sea'. We are all 'lost at sea' would be a very correct statement, yet we are not all deceased. The bottom line is really simple... the use of language is what some would call magic, as in casting a magic spell.(spelling and the putting together of those spelled words).
  5. You are automatically 'lost at sea' as soon as your mother registered your birth certificate. You became a 'fiction' as opposed to a real person. You were/are treated the same as a commerce ship which was actually lost at sea. The result of all of this makes you a 'citizen' of the United States Inc., and not a sovereign individual of These United States Of America.
  6. Good question Jammer. At least two of those options are on the table, not sure yet about the future one. Although, past, present and future are all happening at the same time...('time' being used strictly in context with the statement). If then this is so, consciousness can access all three if consciousness is properly understood. I believe that these structures we can see on Earth, are not physically in this dimension, not physically at those coordinates. Why would an advance technological civilization build such a huge complex... on the side of a mountain? Taking the simpler path is easier for me. These images are being inserted into GE images. Actively or passively, I couldn't say. To see them requires no focused attention or theta frequency or meditative state on anyone's part... just click and look. Yet there they are. Since finding the same type of structures on Mars, maybe that is where the Earth images came from and someone (?) is putting them on GE for everyone to see. The structures/complexes are real and intelligently built. Close examination of the detail will bear that out. That is all that I am certain of at this time. The rest, of course, is speculation, but I believe the correct answer is but one of a few choices.
  7. Yep, that's interesting. Not only did the M.E say the death date was 7-16-1999, he even put in the time of 9:41PM on the 16th. Hmmm... Download and enlarge
  8. Last image I will post from Mars. Same location as first Mars image. Echus Chasma. 02 04 49.97N, 81 05 52.21W . I don't know if this is really there or not. I believe it is a real complex, but since there are no historical images for Mars or Moon, I can't verify whether it is physically there or just showing up like the ones on Earth. Maybe the images of structures we see on Earth are from Mars. If you look at this area on Mars, it does look like it was purposely washed out to cover the evidence. This is much like what can be seen in Hale Crater on Mars. Anyway...
  9. Another 'circuit board' image. This image has been inverted and sharpened a lot to bring out the detail, I also ran it through curves. For those who wish to travel a little further to see this area, the coordinates are 04 33 32.02N, 81 12 32.32W . Oh... this is on Mars but this is not about Mars, it is about these structures that are everywhere.
  10. Thx... I hate debunking cool stuff though
  11. Slightly different but taken at same time. No Q
  12. It's photo shopped. A little blurry but you can see there is no Q
  13. @Panx... I ran the image through FotoForensics. The Q does not appear to be photo shopped although the image was run through Adobe Photo shop, but most likely for sharpening and contrast type of thing. Do you have a link to the original source image?