Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
breezy

The UNITED NATIONS

59 posts in this topic

I think it's time for a thread on the UN, when I read articles like the following, it makes me wonder how much power they should be given. climate change, control of the oceans, armed forces, etc.  Seems as though the UN's intent is to take completely over the world, and determine that everyone is going to be subject to whatever rules they pass. What is it they say..."Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely"

 

Exclusive: The UN starts toward new control over the world's oceans

April 8, 2016

George Russell

 

post-5-0-18556600-1460171572_thumb.jpg

 

"The United Nations has launched a far-reaching initiative that could give U.N.-sponsored authorities sway over the biological resources of the high seas—all the waters that lie outside national territories and economic zones.    

 
The potential shift in power involves multi-trillion-dollar issues, such as whether large areas—conceivably, as much as 30 percent-- of the world’s international waters should be designated as no-go areas to protect biological diversity; whether and how to require elaborate “environmental impact assessments” for future ocean development projects; and how to divide up the economic benefits from the future development of “marine genetic resources.”
 
Eden Charles, a diplomat from Trinidad and Tobago who is serving as the chairman for a U.N. preparatory committee that began the discussions this week underlined to Fox News that the talks are at a “very, very preliminary stage.”
 
Overall, the hoped-for treaty will cover “two-thirds of the oceans, almost half the planet,” says Lisa Speer, a senior official of the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), which is in turn a lead member of a squadron of 33 environmentalist groups banded together as the High Seas Alliance to lobby for protectionist measures during the talks."
snip
7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to see the UN to be torn down to nothing.

Then rebuild a new global hub for world peace with the right intention that can AID our progress as a whole.

 

The UN is after all, made by the War Winners.

It's very unfair, dysfunctional and infiltrated BADLY by Chinese and South Korean lobbyists. (And apparently got the worst head of the UN in its history, according to the people who are working in there now.)

 

If we are to retain this level of reality for a while, then I'd also like to see Asian version of NATO formed for a while.

 

(But I'm hoping our future to be far more different and more sophisticated than still requiring to deal with such low level of distrusting attitude.) 

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UN=Ununited Nations

 

Divide et Impera

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama Administration Is Set to Give Away American Sovereignty to U.N.

Michael Ware

April 9, 2016

 

 

"Not unlike the Climate Treaty Obama signed lasts summer, there is now in the works a similar treaty which will give vast control of the world’s oceans over to the U.N. This move will once again grant to the U.N. authority that the Constitution forbids.

 
Fox reports
 
The United Nations has launched a far-reaching initiative that could give U.N.-sponsored authorities sway over the biological resources of the high seas—all the waters that lie outside national territories and economic zones.
 
The potential shift in power involves multi-trillion-dollar issues, such as whether large areas—conceivably, as much as 30 percent– of the world’s international waters should be designated as no-go areas to protect biological diversity; whether and how to require elaborate “environmental impact assessments” for future ocean development projects; and how to divide up the economic benefits from the future development of “marine genetic resources.”
 
This treaty has many layers. First, it will set aside large areas for reserves, much like what we see in parks in the Midwest. This will be done in the name of preservation. This will mean that places like the seas off the North East will be closed to fishing.
 
This will produce a significant economic drop and a shift in wealth. Fish which was $2.00 a pound will be $10.00 a pound.
 
The next thing will be a sharing of technology. When someone puts significant amounts of capital into discovering genetic resources, they will have to share with member nations. This will kill most drive for such spending and discovery. It will insure no edge in the market and will eventually come to the country free via someone else’s risk."
snip
 
Guns, Climate, now the Oceans.   How about all of our Nat'l Parks now being owned by the UN?  
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama, Xi to Sign UN Global Warming Pact on Earth Day

April 21, 2016

William F. Jasper

 

"With Earth Day as a backdrop and a propaganda pretext, President Obama will join Communist Chinese dictator Xi Jinping on April 22, in signing the Paris climate change accord that emerged from the United Nations summit in Paris last December. The Paris pact has been heralded as a major breakthrough in “saving the planet” from the fictitious threat of anthropogenic (man-made) global warming, or AGW.

 
The Obama-Xi “partnership” is credited with providing the impetus for finalizing the draconian global deal that will penalize the world’s poor, impoverish the United States, and reward Wall Street “carbon investors” and tyrannical regimes — while having zero impact on the planet’s climate. (See our extensive coverage — articles, interviews, and video reports — of the 2015 UN Paris conference here.)
 
Unlike “President” Xi and other dictators who will be signing the UN agreement, President Obama does not enjoy their autocratic powers to enact the treaty by executive decree— even though he has become accustomed to acting as if he already does possess that authority. He knows that even with all of the establishment media support thus far, and with the additional propaganda to be gained from the Earth Day signing, there is still a major roadblock to final adoption: the U.S. Senate. According to our U.S. Constitution (which Obama has taken an oath to uphold), the Senate must ratify all treaties — and there is little likelihood that the Senate will vote in favor of the Paris monstrosity anytime soon."
snip
 
 
With Global Goals agreed, UN focuses on what it will take to achieve sustainability targets by 2030
"20 April 2016 –
 
In a watershed moment for international cooperation, global political, business and civil society leaders are headed to New York where they will pledge fast action on the new United Nations sustainable development agenda and the landmark Paris climate agreement, to build on momentum from 2015 to create a better future for people and the planet.
 
“From a historical perspective, this will be a great day for the United Nations,” Selwin Hart, the Director of the UN Secretary-General’s Climate Change Support Team, recently said in reference to this coming Friday, when leaders from more than 160 countries are expected at UN Headquarters to sign the Paris Agreement, adopted last December at the UN climate change conference (COP21).
 
The event is being preceded on Thursday by a High Level Thematic Debate on Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a set of 17 global goals to wipe out poverty, fight inequality and tackle climate change over the next 15 years. These are the basis of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by UN Member States last September.
 
Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday, David Nabarro, the Secretary-General's Special Adviser on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Climate Change, told reporters that the signing of the Paris Agreement is crucial because achieving progress in relation to climate change is central to the broader effort of achieving the SDGs."
snip
 
 
UN signing away national sovereignty today
April 22, 2016
Judi McLeod
 
 
"Meanwhile, the U.S. will have chosen a new president, while the United Nations has already crowned itself with King of the World status"
 
"It’s not the Donald J. Trump proposed temporary wall to keep America safe from undocumented refugees that’ should be the biggest worry, but the wall getting the green light today at the United Nations.
 
No one will be able to scale the UN wall, which makes—starting today—all of civilian society walled-in-by-bureaucracy global citizens.
 
The sound of the UN prison gate slamming shut, as noiseless as the tree falling in a forest with no one there to hear, won’t initially alarm populations preoccupied with the failing economies of their own nations.
 
But, after today, no country will be allowed the distinction of sovereignty as civil society becomes the UN’s long-touted One World Order, instituted under the cover of Agenda 21/2030’s global warming/climate change.
 
“Four months after nearly 200 nations finally reached an historic deal in Paris to address climate change, more than 160 of them will send representatives April 22 to sign it in New York, in hopes of getting the deal entered into force well before 2020. (Bloomberg, April 20, 2016)
 
“United Nations and world leaders are touting the likely historic nature of the April 22 ceremony—they expect to set a record for the number of leaders signing an international agreement on a single day—with a total of 162 nations planning to send representatives to UN headquarters, the UN said April 19.
snip
 
Well no wonder Obama wants to run the UN  The First, The One and Only World President.  Gee, wonder if that's why he keeps yapping about the UK's Brexit from the EU??
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congress Remains Silent As UN Demands U.S. Taxpayer Money And Open Borders For Muslim Refugees 

From April 20, 2016

 ROBERT KRAYCHIK

 

 

"The muslim brotherhood has engineered its way into the UN. Another reason to get the UN out of the United States. This organization, influenced by those that wish to dominate world, needs to be destroyed.  They have no right to dictate to us.

 

Rampant immigration is the tool to break down traditional societies and cultures, to make way for the full implementation of Sustainable Development (aka Technocracy). The UN believes that the only path to Sustainable Development is through an ‘inclusive’, multicultural society. Europe is already learning painful lessons from these policies as their societies disintegrate right before their eyes. If Americans saw immigration policies for what they are, they would cause another revolution to stop it.

 

Requesting open-ended and unconditional funding from American taxpayers for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees where she is second in command, Kelly Clements framed her agency’s work as an essential “humanitarian” endeavor in the international arena. Speaking before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Monday, her requests and recommendations were virtually unchallenged by any senators, either Republican or Democrat.
 
Warning against policy changes to restrict the entrance of Muslim or other refugees and immigrants into America, Clements described such proposed or implemented measures as an “attack” on the security of migrants she claims her agency serves.
 
“We are witnessing today an unprecedented attack on the ability of uprooted individuals and families to find protection from harm,” said Clements, indirectly referencing Donald Trump and Senator Ted Cruz. “In some cases, particularly in industrialized countries, this attack takes the form of policies that prevent or discourage asylum seekers from accessing protection. In other cases we see closure of borders, making it nearly impossible for persons fleeing persecution and violence to find safety in neighboring countries.”
 
Using “industrialized countries” as a euphemism for Western Europe and the broader West, Clements ignored that such states are not neighbors of Syria or other failed Muslim-majority states currently hemorrhaging its residents.
 
Refusing to acknowledge the overlap between Muslims and Islamic terrorism, Clements mischaracterized dissident positions as opposing the admission of all refugees. Without explanation, she wrote off all security implications pertaining to the bringing in of Muslims as refugees and immigrants."
snip
 
Meanwhile DHS is bringing them in and turning the loose w/o any documentation. DHS = Dept. of "HOMELAND SECURITY" = oxymorans
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Congress Remains Silent As UN Demands U.S. Taxpayer Money And Open Borders For Muslim Refugees 

From April 20, 2016

 ROBERT KRAYCHIK

 

 

"The muslim brotherhood has engineered its way into the UN. Another reason to get the UN out of the United States. This organization, influenced by those that wish to dominate world, needs to be destroyed.  They have no right to dictate to us.

 

 

 
 

 

 

You REAP what you SEW....

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Major! United Nations Secret Leaked! Undeniable Documented Proof It’s About To Get Really Bad!

June 4, 2016

Lisa Haven

 

 

"All of us should be outraged by the United Nations summit in Korea this week that adopted a global “action plan” demanding a planetary education regime that will brainwash our children into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded world citizens.

 
In other words the UN will promote “merged development” of the “whole person” including their beliefs, values, spirituality and lifestyle. Their goal included indoctrinating our youth to understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote the UN agenda for the “common good.” Meaning throw personal individuality and freedom out the door and accept the hive mentality of “the good of the whole.”
 
If that wasn’t bad enough it also details how they plan to integrate the New World Order concept into our youth by, “exploring ways and means by which education for global citizenship can be integrated into curricula and the agenda for education.”
 
PURE OUTRAGE!
 
Another disturbing document is UNESCO’s UN Decade of Education For Sustainable Development report that lays out, in detail, what the summit in Korea was truly about—brainwashing citizens and our youth to be poor obedient “sustainability-minded, social-justice, world citizens.”
 
Probably the most shocking information contained in UNESCO’s report is found on page 12-13 which states:
 
“Generally, more highly educated people, who have higher incomes, consume more resources than poorly educated people, who tend to have lower incomes. In this case more education increases the threat to sustainability.” (pg.12)
 
The report further details:
 
“Simply educating the citizens [specifically the US] to higher levels is not sufficient for creating sustainable societies.” (pg.13)
 
In other words, they can’t “educate” the citizens to follow their agenda, therefore they brainwash our children and target the middle class. The more money you and I have, the worse off the “world” is, therefore it is their goal to force us into poverty and make us a lower poorer class of obedient zombies. Keep in mind this agenda has been promoted and accepted in a majority of countries—all of whom are dictators wanting to control their citizens and all of whom plan on keeping money in their pockets while taking ours.
 
But that’s not all! The report also details how they plan on “indoctrinating” children in the schools to accomplish the sustainable development agenda for the next generation: 
 
“An important distinction is the difference between education about sustainable development and education for sustainable development. The first is an awareness lesson or theoretical discussion. The second is the use of education as a tool to achieve sustainability. In our opinion, more than a theoretical discussion is needed at this critical juncture in time. While some people argue that “for” indicates indoctrination, we think “for” indicates a purpose.” (pg. 9)
 
In other words instead of calling it what it truly is, indoctrination, lets put it under a new label and call it “purpose” because just educating people about isn’t good enough, they have to force it!
 
OUTRAGE!
 
The report further details how the role of women is essential and they need their participation in order to accomplish more depopulation:
 
“The full participation of women is essential to achieve sustainable development….an educated woman tends to desire a smaller family size and seek the health care necessary to do so. She has fewer and healthier children.” (pg.11-13)
 
While I’m all for women being educated, you should not do this under the banner of attacking traditional values or forcing it on a population. There is nothing wrong with a stay-at-home parent, which is exactly what they are attacking in this section of the report.
 
Please understand the agenda here, they want to indoctrinate your youth and the world and make them into poor lower-class sustainable development zombies—which includes depopulation, the homosexuality agenda, abortion, socialism, freedom loss, bondage and tyranny.
 
In the video below I detail all of the above and a HECK of a lot more! If you’ve never seen a video of mine, this is the one to watch! As it is one of the MOST important I’ve done to date!
snip
 
Another source
 
UN Adopts “Education” Plan to Indoctrinate Children in Globalism
June 3, 2016
Alex Newman
 
"A United Nations summit in Korea this week adopted a global “action plan” demanding a planetary “education” regime to transform children around the world into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded “global citizens.” Among other elements, that means the UN-directed global education must promote “integrated development” of the “whole person,” including the formation of their ethics, values, and spirituality, the final document declared. The global-citizenship programs, with definitions to be incorporated in curricula worldwide, should also indoctrinate children so that they understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote what the UN and its member governments consider to be the “common good.”    
 
The controversial action plan, approved by the UN's propaganda department and a group of largely government-funded “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) on June 1 in Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, is aimed at helping the UN impose its Agenda 2030 scheme to “transform the world.” In fact, the title of the summit gave away the agenda: “Education for Global Citizenship: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Together.” As The New American has documented extensively, the UN Agenda 2030 plan, also known as the “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs), was approved by governments and dictators last year as a road map toward global control (tyranny). From national and international wealth redistribution to government healthcare and legal abortion for all, the controversial Agenda 2030 vows repeatedly to leave “no-one behind.”
snip
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Global Gun Control Advocates to Meet in NYC to Set UN Disarmament Agenda

June 5, 2016

Joe Wolverton

 

 

"Anti-gun globalists will meet in New York City this week discuss ways to confiscate small arms and ammunition from civilians and to consolidate monopoly control over those weapons in the hands of the governments of United Nations (UN) member states. The convention is part of a UN-controlled process of disarmament called the Programme of Action (PoA).

 
From June 6-10 delegates from around the world will attend the Sixth Biennial Meeting of States (BMS6) of the PoA. This latest planning meeting will give delegates an opportunity to move the ball closer to the goal of ridding the world's civilian population of the small arms and ammunition that could challenge the ability of UN-approved governments to carry out the will of the world body.
 
Serving as an agenda for the deliberations will be the Chair's Summary published after the last meeting in 2015. For Americans, then, it will be instructive to examine this document and identify all of the proposals that would violate the Constitution, specifically the right to keep and bear arms as protected by the Second Amendment. To this end, I will highlight a few of the provisions of the Chair's Summary that represent the most clear and present danger to liberty.
 
First, the plan as put forth in the Chair's Summary calls for the UN's member states to eliminate the threat of technologically advanced weapons, including so-called polymer firearms and 3D printed guns, as well as the tracking of materials used in the “craft-production of small arms and light weapons.”
 
Not surprisingly, the representative from China called for increased UN-mandated regulations on 3D printers and the weapons they produce.
 
Specifically, the Chair's Summary calls for “strengthening 3D printing regulations in the context of 3D weapon printing,” for “ensuring export licenses [are] in place for 3D printers,” for drawing global attention to “the need to pay attention to the resale of such printers,” and for “strengthening controls over 3D printing technology.”
 
No one is shocked, of course, that the globalists at the UN want to draw up comprehensive plans to take guns — any and every variety of gun — out of the hands of civilians."
 
 
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UN's Ban Ki-moon admits threats resulted in Saudi-led coalition being removed from blacklist

June 9, 2016

 

 

"UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has admitted that his decision to remove the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen from the organization's blacklist came after threats from a number of countries. Human rights groups are urging him to backtrack on the decision.

 

Ban said on Thursday that temporarily removing the coalition from the blacklist was "one of the most painful and difficult decisions I have had to make," and that it raised “the very real prospect that millions of other children would suffer grievously."
 
"Children already at risk in Palestine, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen and so many other places would fall further into despair," he told reporters.
 
The UN secretary-general added that "it is unacceptable for member states to exert undue pressure...scrutiny is a natural and necessary part of the work of the United Nations.
 
Ban did not specifically mention the Saudi-led coalition in his remarks.
 
It comes after a diplomatic source told Reuters on condition of anonymity that the UN was faced with “bullying, threats [and] pressure” from Riyadh, adding that it was “real blackmail.”
 
The source also said there was a threat of “clerics in Riyadh meeting to issue a fatwa against the UN, declaring it anti-Muslim, which would mean no contacts of OIC [Organisation of Islamic Cooperation] members, no relations, contributions, support, to any UN projects [or] programs.”
 
A fatwa is a legal opinion used in sharia law. In Saudi Arabia, they can only be issued by the group of top, government-appointed clerics and are sometimes commissioned by the ruling family to back up its political positions.
 
In addition, several diplomatic sources said the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) would be hit especially hard if the blacklisting were upheld. Saudi Arabia was the fourth-biggest donor to the UNRWA last year, supplying it with nearly US$100 million."
snip
 
color me surprised that the UN can be blackmailed
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is mainly an information post, in case anyone didn't know.

 

A long time ago I knew someone who told me a couple things. That the UN was the New World Order, that the day would come that we would need passports to travel between states, that they had plans for a super highway through the states, that would end up being for the movement of UN troops/supplies only. So then, it seems he was right on more than one of these predictions.  At this point, I think it's safe to say, most of us feel the UN definitely is the NWO.  As of January 22, 2018, any state who's ID or Driver's license does not meet federal standards (chipped), will not be able to fly within the US without a passport. At this time 4 states do not meet those requirements. Minnesota, Louisiana, New Hampshire, and New York. The super highway is called the NASCO/NAFTA super highway, and was/is supposed to run from Mexico to Canada, through the midwest of the US. I believe that when Bush was president, ground was broken for this super highway, in Texas.

 

What I suggest, is that everyone pays attention to anything about the UN that comes up.  Such as our National parks being turned over to UNESCO.  The UN gun treaty for small arms that Kerry/Obama signed us onto without Congressional approval. How the UN has determined that the US should pay reparations to people who's families were held as slaves. All of these things the UN is demanding of this country. What right do they have to demand anything of the US?  When other members states with the worst humanitarian record in history, can be chosen to head the world's humanitarianism problems, and can be blackmailed by those very countries, to do their bidding?  Some links

 

Alert! U.N. Military Invading America with Obama’s Blessing!

https://flatoutunconstitutional.com/2015/10/06/alert-u-n-military-invading-america-with-obamas-blessing/

 

Passengers From 4 States May Soon Need A Passport For Domestic Flights

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/states-need-passports-to-fly-domestic_us_5602ccc1e4b08820d91b0e47

 

THE SUPERHIGHWAY FACTS   supposedly for trade, but we all know these trade agreements are really about us losing our sovereignty

http://www.greatdreams.com/political/superhighway_facts.htm

 

Did the United Nations Just Introduce a New World Order? =  Agenda 2030

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/52333-did-the-united-nations-just-introduce-a-new-world-order

 

Does the UN own US National Parks?

http://judicialmisconduct.blogspot.com/2011/11/does-un-own-us-national-parks.html

 

From Slavery Reparations to Voter-ID Laws, UN 'Working Group' Slams U.S.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/lack-reparations-voter-id-laws-un-experts-slam-us

 

Why Is Saudi Arabia Heading a UN Human Rights Council Panel?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/22/why-is-saudi-arabia-heading-the-u-n-human-rights-council.html

 

UN's Ban Ki-Moon says Saudi Arabia 'pressured' him for blacklist removal

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-10/saudis-pressured-ban-ki-moon-for-blacklist-removal-he-says/7498594

 

U.N. appeals to U.S. to take in Syrian refugees as example for world

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/11/19/un-appeals-us-take-syrian-refugees-example-world/76046082/

 

U.N.'s secret plan for 10 times more Syrian 'refugees'

 

UN Gun Control Body Supported By Obama Sets Up Veto-Proof Framework

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/27/un-gun-control-body-supported-by-obama-sets-up-veto-proof-framework/

 

Secretary of State John Kerry Signs United Nations Gun Ban Treaty Against Wishes of U.S. Senate

http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/secretary-of-state-john-kerry-signs-united-nations-gun-ban-treaty-against-wishes-of-u-s-senate/

 

UN Plot to Confiscate American Guns Just Took a Giant Step Forward - Thanks Congress!

http://freedomoutpost.com/un-plot-to-confiscate-american-guns-just-took-a-giant-step-forward-thanks-congress/

 

OK, that's enough about all of this, for now, that is.  I really started on this for the following reason.  Information, Guns and 2nd Amendment  Two years ago, the UN sent out this employment opportunity notice.

 

Posting Title:
Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer, P4
Job Code Title:
DISARMAMENT, DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OFFICER
Department/ Office:
Department of Peacekeeping Operations
Duty Station:
NEW YORK
Posting Period:
27 May 2014-25 July 2014
Job Opening number:
14-SEI-DPKO-34627-R-NEW YORK ®
Staffing Exercise ID:
N/A

 

https://inspira.un.org/psc/UNCAREERS/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/UN_CUSTOMIZATIONS.UN_JOB_DETAIL.GBL?Page=UN_JOB_DETAIL&Action=A&JobOpeningId=34627&&utm_content=buffer67ce3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&

 

ALERT: UNITED NATIONS HIRING “DISARMAMENT OFFICERS” TO TAKE AMERICAN GUNS

http://www.secretsofthefed.com/alert-united-nations-hiring-disarmament-officers-to-take-american-guns/#.V2CfrIsn46p.facebook

 

Beings as how this last was from 2 years ago, would we be able to presume it's been fully implemented by now?  

i'm not trying to get you afraid, I'm simply trying to get people to be aware.  Things that seem small and unimportant, can be very important when in relation to other seemingly unimportant incidences. Omar Mateen, the shootings in Orlando, worked for G4S, who contracted to DHS, His parents, the White House, and all we've heard from them is more gun control, since it happened. Gun control for whom? American citizens, not extreme Islamists.

 

DHS AND THE UN CALLING FOR GUN CONTROL IN THE WAKE OF ORLANDO

http://unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/dhs-un-calling-gun-control-orlando/

 

Guess who this is. Guess what his son did in Orlando a few days ago. Guess whose office he is seen visiting in this pic.

http://myfreshnews.com/guess-guess-son-orlando-days-ago-guess-whose-office-seen-visiting-pic

Tx Reddwolf

 

Although we have 23 areas called no go zones in the US, that they use for violent training.  

 

ALERT: This Map Shows Muslim “No-Go Zones” Already in the US [PICTURE]

http://conservativetribune.com/map-muslim-no-go-zones/

 

A Muslim woman, just got caught coming across the border with maps of gas pipelines in the US.

“Islamic Refugee” With Gas Pipeline Plans Arrested In New Mexico Border County

 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-15/%E2%80%9Cislamic-refugee%E2%80%9D-gas-pipeline-plans-arrested-new-mexico-border-county

 

There is an ISIS training facility in Mexico just across the border from El Paso, Texas.

Report: ISIS Training Camp in Mexico Near El Paso, Texas

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=24404

Tx Reddwolf

 

I'm done for now and hope you find info in this post that you weren't aware of until now.  Eyes open, no fear! seems to fit.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Israel elected to head permanent U.N. committee for first time

 

benjamin_netanyahu4.jpg

 

Israel on Monday won an election to chair the United Nations' legal committee, the first time that it will head one of the world body's six permanent committees since joining the U.N. in 1949.

 

While it is a largely symbolic and procedural role, chairing the committee will give Israel a chance to have a higher profile in routine affairs at the United Nations.

The so-called Legal Committee, or Sixth Committee, oversees issues related to international law. The General Assembly has six standing committees that report to it, on: disarmament, economic and financial issues, human rights, decolonization, the U.N. budget, and legal issues.

 

"I am proud to be the first Israeli elected to this position," Israel U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said in a statement.

 

"Israel is a world leader in international law and in fighting terrorism," he added. "We are pleased to have the opportunity to share our knowledge with the countries of the world."

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-israel-un-idUSKCN0YZ2FT

 

 

First, the UN appoints Saudi as chair of Human Rights Committee.... and now the UN has put Israel in as Chair of Legal Committee.... 

 

quote LH The Lunatics are now officially in charge of the asylum.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U.N. adds Saudi coalition to blacklist for killing children in Yemen

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-rights-un-saudi-yemen-idUSKCN0YO2RK

 

Then...the friggin useless piece of ")'($&!)(  did this....

 

UN chief says threat forced him to remove Saudi Arabia from blacklist

http://www.dawn.com/news/1263872

 

UN buckles under Saudi pressure, removes coalition from blacklist

http://www.yemenpeaceproject.org/readings/un-buckles-under-saudi-pressure-removes-coalition-from-blacklist/

 

 

No point of holding up the UN as something accountable.

 

I repost this image again.

 

25th Sept 2015.

What we call "Agenda 2030" got installed by the UN.

 

post-11-0-17036600-1466308055_thumb.jpg

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What are military UN trucks doing in Virginia? Bemused motorists spot white 'combat vehicles' on the interstate
Charlie Moore
June 27, 2016
 
 
"Military U.N. vehicles have been spotted in Virginia, shocking motorists and sparking conspiracy theories. 
 
The white trucks, equipped with large off-road tires, were seen being transported on Interstate 81 on Friday. They appear to be Alpine Armoring's Pit-Bull VX SWAT Truck models.
 
Jeff Stern posted photos of the vehicles on Facebook, writing: 'Can't begin to tell you how many of these I passed today on 81 near Lexington VA. Interesting times ahead!'
 
35B6338200000578-3661842-U_N_vehicles_ha
U.N. vehicles have been spotted in Virginia, shocking motorists and sparking conspiracy theories
 
Fernando Johnson questioned online: 'Tactical Vehicles, with bullet proof glass? Whatever could those be for, and why are UN vehicles here, in THIS country?!' 
 
Meanwhile, Vincent Sammons noted on Facebook: 'They are sealed against gas too.'
 
Another online commenter said: 'We have U.N. vehicles being shipped on U.S. highways. One has to wonder why?'
Bobby Wayne Guinn posted on Facebook that he had witnessed similar scenes in Texas. 
 
He wrote: 'Wondering why 30 United Nations vehicles, fully loaded with combat-prepared troops, were driving down our highway in Dallas, Texas.'
 
35B6337400000578-3661842-The_white_truck
The white trucks, equipped with large off-road tyres, were seen being transported on Interstate 81 on Friday
snip
 
I'd like to suggest, that those "bemused" Americans open their eyes, as there really is nothing to be "bemused" about.  Time to see what's right in front of you! :angry2:  :angry2:
 
UPDATED – EYEWITNESS: UN TROOPS IN TEXAS: “30 UN Vehicles Fully Loaded With Combat
Prepared Troops”
June 26, 2016
 
 
"An eyewitness Facebook post warning is going viral that shares one Vietnam Veterans recent experience down in Dallas, Texas. The warning, reposted by American Gun Rights-Texas who are requesting confirmation of this post, warns of 30 United Nations vehicles, fully loaded with combat prepared troops, driving down I-30 towards Garland, Texas.
 
10342402_1483172248566187_90704633658022

 

Are these UN troops here preparing for economic collapse in America? Is this related to Iran ships approaching the US border? Is this tied to this warning from John Moore via Susan Duclos: Military Vehicles Moved Through US At Night, Hidden In The Day? The Alex Jones video from days ago appears to be warning us of exactly this: “The UN Takeover of America.”

snip

http://libertyisviral.com/eyewitness-un-troops-in-texas-30-un-vehicles-fully-loaded-with-combat-prepared-troops/

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KILLING MACHINE Terrorists ‘actively seeking’ to build deadly army of intelligent killer robots, UN warns

June 29, 2016

Jasper Hamill

 

 

"Shock United Nations research highlights the terrifying prospect of extremists unleashing murder machines on the world"

 

"Terrorists are working to build armies of artificially intelligent killer robots capable of slaughtering vast numbers of innocent civilians.

 
That’s the terrifying claim from a piece of authoritative research published by the United Nations, which recently held an urgent meeting to discuss the threat posed by murderous machines.
 
Experts from dozens of countries convened in Geneva to consider the grim implications of “Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems” (LAWS) which are capable of killing without needing to have a human at the controls.
snip
“Illegal transfers might mean that LAWS would become available to non-state actors [terrorists]. It was noted there may be no incentive for such actors to abide by international norms and this may further increase global or regional instability.”
 
The world is on the edge of a robotics revolution which is expected to see machines take on humans roles and potentially cause unemployment on a truly catastrophic scale.
 
But as robot tech becomes commonplace, it could end up being hijacked by terrorists and used to kill innocent people.
 
The UN report continued: “Due to the inherent dual-use character of many robotic technologies, many systems originally intended for civilian purposes could easily be modified to serve military functions.
 
“This would not only increase the risk of proliferation, but also create accountability problems.”
snip
 
I know this story sounds unlikely, but drones are already being used in warfare, and all types of technology, so perhaps it's not as far fetched as it seems?  I also thought it strange that the UN is doing studies, or perhaps they are really laying a foundation? 
6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

United Nations Says Taking Children to Church Violates Their Rights!

July 11, 2016

Scott Osborn

 

 

"Taking children to Christian worship assemblies violates their human rights, according to a United Nations committee."

 

"The report by the UN “Committee on the Rights of the Child” expressed “concern” that kids in the U.K. are legally required to take part in a daily act of worship, which is “wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character.”

 
When is the UN going to get upset that Islamic children are taken to classes that teach them how to kill the infidel? NEVER of course!
 
"The committee recommended that the government “repeal legal provisions for compulsory attendance at collective worship.” Its recommendations are not legally binding.
Parents can already withdraw their children from collective worship, but the committee wants children to be able to act independently of their parents.
Speaking to The Telegraph, David Burrowes said: “The collective act of worship is not an indoctrination exercise. It is recognizing and respecting the Christian heritage of the country and giving people an opportunity to reflect.”
 
The report also gave 150 other examples where they believe that Britain is violating the rights of children. It included the freedom of parents to reasonably chastise their children.
 
The Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), “the body of 18 Independent experts that monitors implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child by its State parties,” released a report in June 2016:"
snip
 
Tx Reddwolf
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screw the United Nations - may they suffer a quick death.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UN weighs in on Dallas shooting with DESPICABLE statement

Michael Cantrell

July 8, 2016

 

 

"Tragedy struck Dallas last night after at least one angry sniper took to the streets during an anti-police brutality protest and shot 12 police officers, killing five of them, in a truly horrific incident that won’t soon be forgotten.

 
To make matters worse, one suspect responsible for the murder spree stated he was angry over recent law enforcement shootings involving black victims and “wanted to kill white people.”
 
With this obvious indicator that things are not well in our country right now, you’d think an organizations whose mission is centers on peace and security would want to be sensitive to both law enforcement and the black community, working to help foster a sense of unity to begin healing the separation folks are feeling.
 
Unfortunately, that’s not at all what’s happened. In fact, the U.N. released a statement more or less slamming U.S. police as “racists.”
 
via the United Nations Human Rights:
snip
The Working Group is outraged and strongly condemns the new police killings of two African-American men. These killings which were captured on video cannot be ignored. We call for prompt independent investigations to ensure the perpetrators are prosecuted and punished.
 
We also condemn the attacks on police officers in Dallas and call for the perpetrators to be held accountable.
 
Excessive use of force by the police against African Americans in the United States is a regular occurrence. African Americans are reportedly shot at more than twice the rate of white people.
 
The Working Group is monitoring the situation and has repeatedly expressed its concern to the United States Government about police killings of African Americans and called for justice. The Working Group is convinced that the root of the problem lies in the lack of accountability for perpetrators of such killings despite the evidence.
 
The killings also demonstrate a high level of structural and institutional racism. The United States is far from recognizing the same rights for all its citizens. Existing measures to address racist crimes motivated by prejudice are insufficient and have failed to stop the killings.
 
It is time, now, for the US Government to strongly assert that Black lives matter and prevent any further killings as a matter of national priority.”
 
Perhaps the U.N. needs a friendly reminder that we’re a sovereign nation responsible for governing ourselves without the outside help of an organization that clearly has an axe to grind and an agenda to push."
snip
 
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look What The UN Just Did! You Won’t Believe What’s About To Come!!!

 

 

 

 

Pentagon Approves U.N. Use Of Force Against American Civilians

July 15, 2016

Michael Depinto

 

 

"But… But… the folks at the “fact checking sites” said these were all being shipped overseas…. Then again, they never did have an answer for why there were guys with helmetsand construction gear in lots of the trucks… but who knows, maybe their sources told them the soldiers were stowaways…

 
All kidding aside… with all the credible threats from Black Lives Matter… and with the information contained in the documents linked to below… the same ones no one reads before they say, “BS!" Here’s an idea… since our country is on the line… and slipping away fast… how about everyone take a little extra effort to help one another be better informed… myself included. I welcome all the emails I’ve been getting!
 
United Nations Troops on U.S. Soil Prepared to Assist With Martial Law? (Videos)
 
Major Update to Military Movement and Actual Documentation of Their Plans (Video)
 

IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS PEOPLE MIGHT WANT TO READ!

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/2161-docs.pdf

 

Department of Defense Manual Obtained by Judicial Watch, Inc. via FOIA 

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/2161-docs.pdf

 

U.S. Army Civilian Inmate Labor Program

http://www.apd.army.mil/pdffiles/r210_35.pdf

 

U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations

https://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

 

Agenda 2030 Directly from the UN:

http://www.un.org/pga/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/08/120815_outcome-document-of-Summit-for-adoption-of-the-post-2015-development-agenda.pdf

 

Agenda 21 Directly from the UN: 

http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/wssd/summarypublication.pdf

snip

 

The Pentagon have approved a scheme allowing U.N. peacekeeping troops to “police” US citizens. 
 
The federal government have announced their support for a set of principles that allow U.N. troops to police and use force in order to “protect citizens” in the event of an armed conflict.
 
Militarytimes.com reports:
 
The United States has announced its support for a set of principles that give a green light for U.N. peacekeeping troops and police to use force to protect civilians in armed conflicts.
 
U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power told a high-level U.N. meeting Wednesday focusing on the responsibility to protect civilians that the United States was “proud” and “humbled” to join 28 other countries that have pledged to abide by the 18 pledges.
 
U.N. peacekeepers from these 29 countries are now required to act in cases where civilians are in danger.
 
“The Kigali Principles are designed to make sure that civilians are not abandoned by the international community again,” she said, recalling how U.N. peacekeepers left Rwanda before the 1994 genocide and Srebrenica before the 1995 massacre.
 
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tax Meat Until No One Eats It Anymore, Says UN Climate Change Report

Daniel Jennings

July 26, 2016

 

 

"Meat production should be taxed to save the environment and prevent global warming, a United Nations report is recommending.

Professor Maarten Hajer of Utrecht University in the Netherlands authored the report, released by the UN’s International Research Panel (IRP), which is comprised of 34 scientists and 30 governments.
 
“All of the harmful effects on the environment and on health needs to be priced into food products,” Hajer told The Washington Post. “I think it is extremely urgent.”
 
Meat, he argued, should be taxed at the wholesale level to raise the price and deter consumption. He and other members of the IRP assert that livestock creates 14.5 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions that the panel says contribute to climate change.
 
Taxes are needed to deter increases in meat consumption in nations like China, he said.
 
“We think it’s better to price meats earlier in the chain,” Hajer told The Guardian. “It’s sexier to tax it at the consumer level, but not as effective.”
 
“If we were all to copycat the way in which we feed ourselves in North America or Europe [with meat], the planet would be in deep trouble,” Hajer added.
Nations should discourage their citizens from eating meat, the report says.
snip
Rachel Premack, a columnist for The Washington Post’s Wongblog, said the UN’s report deserves serious consideration in the United States.
 
“It may be delicious, but the evidence is accumulating that meat, particularly red meat, is just a disaster for the environment — and not so great for human beings, either,” she wrote, asserting that agriculture consumes 80 percent of water in the US – most of that being for meat. “… For a kilogram of red meat, you need considerably more water than for plant products.”
 
Premack added, “Along with a tax, a meat cutback could be achieved by making plant-based diets more appealing and less expensive.”
 
 
Throwing in an extra link
 
 
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UN Backs Secret Obama Takeover of Police

August 4, 2016

Robert Romano

 

"International org calls for federalization of U.S. law enforcement to be 'beefed up,' cover all of America

 

post-5-0-38951400-1470465675_thumb.jpg  <<<<<DO THESE CITIES RING ANY BELLS???

 

“The Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice has provided oversight and recommendations for improvement of police services in a number of cities with consent decrees. This is one of the most effective ways to reduce discrimination in law enforcement and it needs to be beefed up and increased to cover as many of the 18,000-plus local law enforcement jurisdictions.”

 

That was United Nations Rapporteur Maina Kai on July 27, a representative of the U.N. Human Rights Council, who on the tail-end of touring the U.S., endorsed a little-known and yet highly controversial practice by the Justice Department to effect a federal takeover of local police and corrections departments.

 

The consent decrees are already being implemented in Newark, New Jersey; Miami, Florida; Los Angeles, California; Ferguson, Missouri; Chicago, Illinois; and other municipalities.

 

Here's how it works: the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice files a lawsuit in federal court against a city, county, or state, alleging constitutional and civil rights violations by the police or at a corrections facility. It is done under 42 U.S.C. § 14141, a section of the 1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, granting the attorney general the power to prosecute law enforcement misconduct. The municipality then simply agrees to the judicial finding — without contest — and the result is a wide-reaching federal court order that imposes onerous regulations on local police."

snip

Federal requirements include how searches are conducted, what constitutes legitimate use of force, the mandatory use of on-body cameras by the police, and so forth. The agreements impose years-long compliance review regimes, implementation deadlines, and regular reviews by federal bureaucrats. This makes local police directly answerable to the Civil Rights Division at the DOJ.

snip

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/un-backs-secret-obama-takeover-of-police/

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where I first saw this story, but I refuse to pay to read it. IF you have a subscription, you can.

 

An Internet Giveaway to the U.N.
If the U.S. abdicates internet stewardship, the United Nations might take control.
 
Then I went looking
 
UN Could Take Over ICANN, and the Internet, Oct. 1
Joel B. Pollak
August 29, 2016
 
 
"The United Nations could take over control of the Internet on October 1, when the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) passes from U.S. administration to the control of a multilateral body, most likely the United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU).
 
While the administration and its defenders have denied that the UN will have authority over ICANN, the Wall Street Journal‘s L. Gordon Crovitz points out that ICANN will need to be run by a state agency in order to retain its antitrust exemption, which makes it almost certainly that the UN will step in to take control.
 
It’s shocking the administration admits it has no plan for how Icann retains its antitrust exemption. The reason Icann can operate the entire World Wide Web root zone is that it has the status of a legal monopolist, stemming from its contract with the Commerce Department that makes Icann an “instrumentality” of government.
 
 
Without the U.S. contract, Icann would seek to be overseen by another governmental group so as to keep its antitrust exemption. Authoritarian regimes have already proposed Icann become part of the U.N. to make it easier for them to censor the internet globally. So much for the Obama pledge that the U.S. would never be replaced by a “government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution.”
 
UN control would almost certainly allow tyrannical regimes some degree of control over Americans’ Internet use."
snip
 
and
UN TO TAKE CONTROL OF INTERNET OCTOBER 1ST
 
Don't forget there are also provisions in the TPP for controlling the Internet.  
5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those of you that read tthis is a PDF of The Wolves in Sheep's Clothing compiled by Amy McGrath

 

It is worth the read especially the sections on the New World Government and the how the UN and Soros, Obama, Papa Bush etc all play into this cancerous game we are all part of.

 

http://yourvote.net.au/PDF/Wolves-in-Sheeps_Cloting.pdf 

 

A for warning it will rock you as to the manner in which it is being played out and by whom and how so much is being done in such obvious ways  

Wolves-in-Sheeps_Cloting.pdf

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0