kumo

Electrons and all things related. Discussion.

7 posts in this topic

Electron. What is it? Serious question.

 

 According to the pseudo scientific standard model it is a fundamental particle. But if one looks from experimental perspective and keeps an open mind it does not seem that electron is what pseudo science has taught us.

 

 In our lab we are conducting a lot of experiments related to electrons. Let me rephrase, all of our experiments are related to electrons, or to be more precise, 'something' that becomes an electron when introduced into a bipolar standard electromagnetic environment. (each and every device you use is based on bipolar: + and - environment).

 

 But something truly awesome happens when that 'something' is introduced into a multipolar environment (to avoid confusion, the so called scalar waves, devoid of vector parameters are somewhat similar, if not the same albeit differently described phenomena).

 

 All properties of everything change.

 

 A rather fundamental property of particles is ability to carry information, which changes something at the destination. Take radiowaves. Give them two opposing poles and they are a rather poor means of information transfer. Give them multiple poles and their ability to carry information grows expofuckingnentially.

 

 A lot of it became when Maxwell's equations were 'gutted' to simplify them. How much was lost due to this, one can only begin to imagine..

 

 So the question and the discussion I am looking for is this: what is an electron? What is electricity itself? Electromagnetism? What if polarity is the missing parameter that unlocks brand new areas and abilities of electrons, electricity, electromagnetism, subatomic sciences, etc? Perhaps there are many more parameters that have not been included in any mainstream sciences... 

 

 

 Apart from our experiments (and commercial applications) with biological materials - plants, we have conducted a number of experiments with countless different areas. For example, I attach a picture of a soundspeaker, that uses input from a multipolar waves generating suitcase (pic attached). Let the music play, close your eyes, and surprise surprise, you will not be able to tell from which direction the sound is coming. It feels as if the sound is enveloping you from all directions.

 

 We can transmit massive amounts of information over vast distances pretty much instantly,with the bottleneck being physical storage writing speed.

 

 Lastly, yesterday turned on Discovery Science for a bit, a programme about searching for earth like exoplanets. All the telescopes that SETI uses are useless, truly and utterly, as no advanced civilisation would use electromagnetic waves, when increasing the polarity is so easy and cost effective...

 

 Anyway, let's discuss electrons and all things related.post-1956-0-47343400-1412852784_thumb.pnpost-1956-0-06350800-1412853010_thumb.pn

9 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Extracts from internal document regarding radio telescopes. Translated by a student into English, hence quirky language.

 

 MULTIPOLAR RADIO TELESCOPE AND RADIO TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS

 

 With special construction

multipolar oscillation circuit are formed superpositional new type electromagnetic wave

with new properties. The aim is to that multipolar oscillation circuit can enter into

resonance which my not match any classical resonance system and thereby shape the

new multipolar superpositional electromagnetic wave range.

 

/.../

 

 During research created a thee-polar, five-polar and 21-polar radio transmitters

and three-polar and five-polar radio receivers that uses the appropriate multipolar

oscillatory circuits. As the number of polarities increases inability to ordinary multipolar

wave receivers, which includes classical oscillating circuit. These prototypes are multipolar

transmitters and receivers shows, that it is possible to create a multipolar radio

telescope to detect multipolar superposition of waves and confidential and high-traffic

radio transmission systems.

 

 /.../

 

This article describes how to create / modify the telescope / -s (i.e. a network of

telescopes) so that it can be used as needed as superpozitional multipolar or plain. This

can be solved in two ways: either to enter into a superposition node is not less than three

radio telescopes (they can also be used as usual alone or network) or create a new one

receiver of the radio telescope, which could also operate as a conventional three parallel

receivers, like in a radiotelescope networks, or a multipolar superpositional receiving

host.

This opens the opportunity to explore the radio telescope in space superposition

multipolar radiation. This would be multipolar radio telescope, which would allow space

exploration to the present day not researched radiation and could be indispensable in

such projects as SETI, SETT, as well as participate in projects to study the dark matter as

a new type of detector and many others important applications.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read this book - I'm told it is after this thinking, that the mainstream was deliberately steered into 'non-aether' understandings of 'matter'.

 

 

The Electron Theory of Matter (published in 1914)

 

 

https://ia700600.us.archive.org/10/items/ost-chemistry-the_electron_theory_of_matter/The_electron_theory_of_matter_text.pdf

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And then ponder this article ...

 

 

 

The Magnetic properties of the Electron, Proton and the Neutron.
By N.N. Leonov.

This study offers evidence of diamagnetism in the electron and proton, as well as of paramagnetism of the neutron. Scientists that have repeated E. Rutherfords experiments on nuclear scattering of α-particles, only conducted diffractional analysis of those experimental results. However recent analysis has showed that the nuclei of all chemical elements feature quasi-Crystalline structures and that the proton is a diamagnetic substance, and the neutron is a paramagnetic substance.

Further analysis proves that the classical atomic physics theory of how the the atom is held together to be wrong. That conclusion resulted from the false conclusion of presuming that the absence of a material aether in nature that could interact with atomic particles and resist their motion, as well as from mistaken negligence of magnetic interactions between atomic particles in the current atomic theory of the atom.
                                                         
Application of the theory of non-linear oscillations allowed building adequate structural mathematical models of the atomic nucleus and the atoms with consideration for the magnetic interactions of atomic particles. Using adequate structural models has made it possible to obtain newer detailed data on the structure of atomic particles previously unavailable in quantum physics.

Due to consideration for the resistance of aether to the motion of atomic particles it was found that the actual atomic system of the atom is dissipative rather than conservative as commonly assumed in the quantum theory. This allowed gaining insight into the structure world and particularly, gaining a precise and clear perception of atomic nucleus structure based on experimental data obtained from quantum physics because of its refusal to consider that the aether has an effect on the  atom. Consideration of aether as a “structural material” enabled gaining insight into electron, proton and neutron structures and cleared the way to a better understanding of the infinite divisibility of material elements.
                                                        
Consideration of magnetic interactions among atomic particles gives rise to new challenges. The simplest neutral non excited atom consists of one proton and one electron or the hydrogen atom. Since the detailed understanding of this atoms structure at a first approximation called only for analyzing the electron behavior with relation to the motionless proton. To this effect it was necessary to find out whether magnetic interaction between the electron and the proton induces magnetic attraction or magnetic repulsion and to set up a formula for the interaction force. There are no answers to these questions in quantum physics.
                                                       
 In order to find answers to these questions it was primarily needed to know whether the electron is a paramagnetic substance (paramagnetics are drawn into the external magnetic field) or a diamagnetic substance (diamagnetics are pushed out from the external magnetic field). This can be found out by analyzing the mutual behavior of two free electrons. Experimental observations speak for the fact that electrons are subject to mutual repulsion at any distances. Such a mutual repulsion is induced by the joint effect of electrical and magnetic interactions. Electrical interaction generates a repulsive force equal to αх-2 where α=е2, е=1.602·10-19 Coulomb, and X is the distance between the electrons.

  In order to estimate the force of magnetic interaction, The relations to classical physics has to be addressed. According to the force applied from the external magnetic field intensity Н, an object having a self-magnetic field with a magnetic moment vector of μ is equal to (μН) where u is a Hamiltonian operator (gradient); (μН) is an operator of the scalar product of vectors μ and Н. When expressing Н, classical physics relies upon the dipole theory which is the current hypothesis of magnetism’s nature. Accordingly the intensity of an external magnetic field to an object having a internal magnetic field with a magnetic moment vector μ is Н=3(μr) where r is the vector distance from the magnetic field source to point H.

 It is well known that magnetic moment vector of an object having an internal magnetic field tends to be positioned along the lines of the external magnetic field (magnetic orientation effect). If the distance between two objects is X and the objects have internal magnetic fields with magnetic moments μi and μj while vectors μi and μj lie on the straight line crossing these objects, then the intensities of their magnetic interaction force is equal to 6μiμjх-4.
Thus, magnetic interaction between two free electrons generates a force of 6μе2х-4 in intensity.

If an electron is a paramagnetic substance then there should be a magnetic attraction between two electrons. In this case х=х0 so that the joint effect of electric repulsion and magnetic attraction generates a repulsive forces af х>х0 and a attractive forces af х<х0. Here х0 is given by the relation: αх0-2=6μе2х0-4 so х0=60.5μее-1. According to quantum estimates, е=9.274·10-21erg·Hs-1. Hence, х0=4.73·10-13m. Electron radius is measured by rе=2.8·10-15m. Hence, х0≈170rе and electrons, having approached the distance х<х0, may collapse with each other when affected by the joint electromagnetic attraction and form a stable atomic particle with a mass of 2mе and a electrical charge of (-2е). In order to enable electrons to approach each other to the distance of х=х0 their total approach energy should be equal to 2029.248eV.

This value is less than the ionization energy of an aluminum hydrogen ion. Therefore, objects featuring mass 2mе and charge (-2е) could well exist if the electron is a paramagnetic substance. However, such particles are not observed experimentally. Hence, there is no experimental evidence of any forces of magnetic attraction between two free electrons. The assumption that there is magnetic repulsion between two free electrons does not conflict with the experimental data on mutual behavior of two free electrons. Therefore, when elaborating on the classical atomic particle theory it is appropriate to presume that the electron is a diamagnetic substance and they repel from each other.

 There has been convincing evidences obtained to support the fact that the electron is a diamagnetic substance. However in the course of classical atomic theory development it was established that the total approach energy of 1.63eV would be sufficient to enable two free electrons to approach each other and move to there collapse distances, if the electrons were paramagnetic substances.
                                                   
In elaboration of classical atomic particle theory it was established that the intensity of the internal magnetic field of an atomic particle with a magnetic moment vector μ is described by the equation: Н=(γ+γ1)(μr)rr-4-γ1μr-2 while the intensity of magnetic interaction force of the atomic particle with magnetic moment vectors μi and μj that lie on a straight line crossing these particles is 2γμiμjrij-3.The fact that the r exponent in the equation changes for one unit of Н speaks for the inaccuracy of the current dipole hypotheses theory of the magnetic nature of the atom.

 Equation Н=(γ+γ1)(μr)rr-4-γ1μr-2 was derived in the analysis of hydrogen atoms and hydrogen-like ion structures of the elements on the assumption that vectors μ and r are located on the same straight line. The analysis of the structure of neutral non-excited 4Не shows that in general case, when the direction of r vector is not the same as the one of μ vector, vector Н is described for an electron and proton as follows: Н=(γ+γ1)(μr)r−4[cos2(μ^r)]sr −γ1r−2μ where μ^r is an angle between μ and r, s=27, and γ1=0,19γ. This result indicates that the internal magnetic fields of the electron and the proton feature an extremely narrow, needle-like, dense axial magnetic jet property.
 
As for the magnetic properties of the  proton and neutron, quantum theory produces rather strange information. It is well-known that the magnetic moment is a vector value. Therefore, this values modulus must be positive. Nevertheless, according to μр=2.79·5.05·10-24erg·Hs-1 and μn= -1.91·5.05·10-24erg·Hs-1. Apparently, it should be read as a fact that either the proton or the neutron is a diamagnetic substance.

It was cleared up by means of analyzing structural models of protium, deuterium and tritium atoms and experimental potentials of their ionization. Experimental ionization potentials of protium, deuterium and tritium are А(Н)=13.597eV, А(D)=13.601eV, А(Т)=13.602eV [15]. The study of structural models of these atoms shows that μp, μD and μT all have negative exponents in the expressions for А(Н), А(D) and А(Т). Hence, А(Н) is inversely related to μp while А(D) and А(Т) are inversely related respectively to μD and μT. The deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron and it has one two-nucleon magnetic cluster such that μD=μр+μn. Since А(D)=13.601eV>А(Н)=13.597eV then μD<μр. Hence, vectors μD and μn have opposite directions. It indicates that either both of these nucleons or one of them is diamagnetic.
 
Let us assume that the diamagnetic substance is the neutron. In order to check this assumption we shall analyze the tritium nucleus, that is, Triton. It consists of one proton and two neutrons and features a statically stable configuration where nucleons are located in vertexes of a triangle.Triton has a two-nucleon and a one-nucleon magnetic cluster with its magnetic moment vectors lines lying in parallel straight lines. Two Diamagnetic neutrons cannot belong to a two-nucleon magnetic cluster of triton, because in such case their magnetic field lines would neutralize each other and the triton magnetic moment would be equal to μр. But it follows from А(Т)=13.602eV>А(Н)=13.597eV that μТ<μр. That a two nucleon magnetic cluster of a triton atom cannot consist of only neutrons, it should also include a proton.

As А(Н)=13.597eV, А(D)=13.601eV then μD=μр-ε where 0<ε«μр. And since μD=μр+μn then either μр-ε=μn-μр or μр-ε=μр-μn, i.e. either μn=2μр-ε or μn=ε.
If μn=2μр-ε then, due to the supposed diamagnetic properties of a neutron, the magnetic moment vector of a one-nucleon neutron magnetic cluster of triton shall have the same direction as the magnetic moment vector of a neutron in the two-nucleon magnetic cluster. In this case μТ would exceed μD.

But it follows from А(Т)=13.602eV>A(D)=13.601eV that μТ<μD. In view of this contradiction, μn≠2μр-ε and μn=ε. If μn=ε then, due to supposed diamagnetic properties of the neutron. The magnetic moment vector of a one-nucleon neutron cluster of triton shall have the same direction as the magnetic moment
vector of the proton. In this case the resultant magnetic moment of triton would be equal to μр-μn+kμn=μр-ε+kε>μD which again is in conflict with equation μТ<μD resulting from the experimental values of A(Т) and А(D).

Thus, the neutron is not a diamagnetic substance. Hence, the diamagnetic substance is the proton. Which of the relations, μn=2μр-ε or μn=ε«μр, is true if the diamagnetic substance is the proton. If a two-nucleon magnetic cluster of a triton atom consists of 2 neutrons and μn=2μр-ε then the magnetic
moment vector of the proton is due to its diamagnetic properties,it shall have the same direction as the magnetic moment vectors of the neutrons. In this case μТ=2μn+kμр>μр which is in conflict with equation μТ<μр.

 If a two-nucleon magnetic cluster of triton consists of a proton and μn=2μр-ε then the magnetic moment vector of a one-nucleon neutron cluster shall have the same direction as the magnetic moment vector of proton. In this case μТ=μn-kμn+kμр=2μр-ε-kμр+kε=μр-ε+(1-k)μр+kε>μр-ε=μD. However, according to experimental data, μТ<μD. Hence, μn≠2μр-ε.

If μn=ε«μр and both neutrons are in a two-nucleon magnetic cluster then the magnetic moment vector of the proton shall have the same direction as the magnetic moment vectors of the neutrons. In this case we come back to μТ=μр+2kε>μр which is in conflict with experimental data.
However, if μn=ε and proton is in two-nucleon magnetic cluster of triton then the magnetic moment vector of a one-nucleon neutron cluster shall be opposite to the magnetic moment vector of the proton and μТ=μр-μn-kμn=μр-ε-kε which correlates accurately with the experiment-based equation: μТ<μD.

Thus, the proton is a diamagnetic substance, and the neutron is a paramagnetic substance, μn«μр, and the triton proton is included in the two-nucleon magnetic cluster. The relation between μn and μр can be found quite easily. As А(Н)[А(D)]-1=1-μnμр-1 then μnμр-1=1-(Н)[А(D)]-1=1-13.597·13.601-1=3·10-4. Hence, μn= 3·10-4 μр. The relation between μе and μр can be found in a more difficult way. It appears that μе=8.372μр.
 
The discovery of ethereal vortex-like structures (magnetic lines of force) in electrons and neutrons allows us to understand the fact that magnetism is a phenomenon of jet like nature rather than of dipole or of a current nature.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nikolay Nikolaevich Leonov
Cand. Sc. (Physics and Mathematics), Senior Research Associate
Е-mail: NNLeonov@inbox.ru
---------------------------------------------------------------

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another point of discussion about electrons, is the Periodic Table of Elements.  We all get taught a version of the Periodic Table, that groups elements as a function/result of their valencies, ie the number of electrons in the outer shell.

 

Walter Russell, Bruce Cathie and others have pointed out different groupings, leading to an interesting variety of options to consider.

 

However, it is when you group the elements by the geometric shape of the nucleus, that you start to notice a new model which explains the 'chemical' reactions predicted via the valency-based periodic table.

The groupings are done by the platonic solids and multiples thereof.

 

Once again, we find that the REAL understanding of matter, energy, gravity, electricity and magnetism is withheld from the public, while being exploited by secret elite and 'black project' researchers - presumably with unlimited funding and resources.

 

You HAVE to include the existence of the aether, and understand that it permeates everything and everywhere, not just space.

 

 

I got this in an email from Wylie E. Coyote recently, and I agree with him:

 

----------------------------

 

"Plasma is Diamagnetic and it repels both Gravity and electromagnetic fields. It is the key to anti-gravity work.

 

YES you are "very" correct. The earth is 80% diamagnetic and less than 20% magnetic. Our magnetic field is generated by its oscillation 3.13 Hz. as an isolated resonant sphere in space. PS. I cant spell either. It is impossible to think of advanced concepts and spell at the same time. That is why god invented secretaries...

Remind me to do a longer paper on aether and the hydrogen connection.

Short version primer......

Aether is a hydrogen isotope and so is light. the Photon is a hydrogen isotope atom. 4 electrons centered in quadratures surrounding a single proton.
(dark energy) Tritium is element no 3 on the periodic table. (Dark matter) it has  neutrons. Aether is no 2. Helium is no. 4. Hydrogen is no 1.

Hydrogen gas freezes at 10 degrees above absolute zero. At that temperature it behaves as a solid to light. But as a liquid to solid mass. It answers the aether question. So we drag it along with the earth because it is part of our atmosphere. So Michelson-Morley were half correct.

Hydrogen is also a non conductor of electricity. It is Polarize-able. It has a dielectric of 1 making it a perfect conducting medium for energy transfer with out lose. IE Maxwell's displacement current carrier and it is Diamagnetic. It acts as a solid to transverse waves and as a liquid to linear waves and solids.  So it fits all of the requirements for aether.

Temperature is actually a voltage. 75 degrees on a thermometer is actually 75 volts. etc......  Before the discovery of electricity it was called temperature.

Just like magnetic buoyancy is called Gravity. See the Boltzmann constant formula for reference. Wiki it........ "

 

----------------------------

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
'... be impossible adequately to discuss at this stage the complex questions which present themselves in this connection. It may be permissible to recall that Maxwell's electromagnetic theory had been found to account satisfactorily for the behaviour of light, and electromagnetic waves in general, in free space ; but that difficulties presented themselves when phenomena like refraction and dispersion, which depend upon transmission through material media, were considered. These were found capable of removal by introducing the simple hypothesis that the material media contained particles having appropriate natural frequencies of vibration . Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light naturally suggested that these particles were electrically charged, and the facts of dielectric polarisation were then found to fall into line, approximately at any rate, with the optical phenomena. The theory of the propagation of light in moving media also made important advances under the influence of the new views. A striking confirmation of the correctness of the general position was furnished by Zeemans discovery of the change of the frequency of spectral lines when the emitting source was placed in a strong magnetic field...

The foregoing considerations enable us to define more precisely the use of the word electron. In future we shall restrict the term

to particles which consist of a geometrical configuration of electricity and nothing else, whose mass, that is, is all electro- magnetic. For a particle which is a charged molequle or atom,

that is to say, a molecule or atom which has lost or gained one or more negative electrons, we shall use the term ion."

Wow, not quite through it yet but very interesting. Geometric electrical configuration.. behaviour of light and electromagnetic waves....propagation of light in moving media...natural frequencies of vibrations... Sounds like to me the propagation of magnetic moment by the proton also agrees with the holographic principal of expansion of the proton information., and the geometric formation is likely linked to the star tetrahedron. Flower of life.....wow this is getting most interesting! :rolleyes:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"

Magnetic torque on permanent magnets[edit]
Main article: Magnetic torque

If two like poles of two separate magnets are brought near each other, and one of the magnets is allowed to turn, it promptly rotates to align itself with the first. In this example, the magnetic field of the stationary magnet creates a magnetic torque on the magnet that is free to rotate. This magnetic torque τ tends to align a magnet's poles with the magnetic field lines. A compass, therefore, turns to align itself with Earth's magnetic field."

 Let me get this straight...Magnetic torque. This is what moves the universe...as I have already stated in my paper on" Biocosmological Gal-interactions". The proton emits a magnetic field "pushing the force outward diamagnetically. The neutron pulls the particles  in a flux that is in magnetic field formation, the electron is modulated by the proton and then moves in accordance to the natural magnetic fields being emulated thus causing a triplicity of interaction...and therefore also a rotation of these fields . Matter particles will be attracted within the magnetic field and thus causing a density which can be translated into gravity....or  more dense matter. Grav waves are proportionate to the matter density of a body.

Please explain if I got that wrong....

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now